PODCAST Thread

[Milkshark]

thats me - on the mobile this week as i had to work late and had no microphone

Lucky, was going to say he was the only one with half a clue

 

[Sir Chadley]

Lucky, was going to say he was the only one with half a clue

I thought what they both said made a lot of sense and was on the point.

What did Dan say that made you think he didn't have a clue?

 

[Sir Chadley]

I have only one criticism of Snowy's podcast and that is there is too much swearing.

Believe it or not, I am no prude but if you are looking for someone in the media to notice you and perhaps give you the opportunity of a lifetime then I don't think a podcast littered with four letter words is going to help.

And guys, I do think you have some potential, you both speak well and are knowledgeable of the game.

I just don't think you need to resort to that type of language. I think you are both better than that.

 

[Proud Shark]

I have only one criticism of Snowy's podcast and that is there is too much swearing.

Believe it or not, I am no prude but if you are looking for someone in the media to notice you and perhaps give you the opportunity of a lifetime then I don't think a podcast littered with four letter words is going to help.

And guys, I do think you have some potential, you both speak well and are knowledgeable of the game.

I just don't think you need to resort to that type of language. I think you are both better than that.

I reckon they might have some four letter words to use in response to this.

 

[Sir Chadley]

I reckon they might have some four letter words to use in response to this.

Ha ha, maybe mate. No worries, it's just my opinion. They can keep going the way they have if they'll like, I'll still listen.

 

[Milkshark]

I thought what they both said made a lot of sense and was on the point.

What did Dan say that made you think he didn't have a clue?

Perhaps i'm being harsh but he gave Ronaldo a point in his 3,2,1's

 

[Milkshark]

I have only one criticism of Snowy's podcast and that is there is too much swearing.

I like the swearing

 

[Sir Chadley]

Perhaps i'm being harsh but he gave Ronaldo a point in his 3,2,1's

Yes mate you are being harsh, Ronaldo had a good enough game to get a point in the 3, 2 1s.

I like the swearing

Fair enough and I can cop it but I just don't think it is needed. It's almost like they think they'd be boring if they didn't swear. Not true at all. They speak well and are anything but boring.

 

[Milkshark]

Yes mate you are being harsh, Ronaldo had a good enough game to get a point in the 3, 2 1s.



Fair enough and I can cop it but I just don't think it is needed. It's almost like they think they'd be boring if they didn't swear. Not true at all. They speak well and are anything but boring.

I agree its not needed but I take it as just a fun sharks podcast, nothing too serious.

Also agree they speak well.

 

[snowman]

I have only one criticism of Snowy's podcast and that is there is too much swearing.

Believe it or not, I am no prude but if you are looking for someone in the media to notice you and perhaps give you the opportunity of a lifetime then I don't think a podcast littered with four letter words is going to help.

And guys, I do think you have some potential, you both speak well and are knowledgeable of the game.

I just don't think you need to resort to that type of language. I think you are both better than that.

Both Dan and I have done media degrees and I can tell you neither of us want to get noticed

But yes, toning the swearing is on the cards as we have a few listeners who we like that are a bit sensitive

 

[Sparkles]

Both Dan and I have done media degrees and I can tell you neither of us want to get noticed

But yes, toning the swearing is on the cards as we have a few listeners who we like that are a bit sensitive

Genuinely think you'd do well to tone down the style of criticism. Not stop having an opinion, even a strong one, but you know what I mean. Calling blokes spastics etc and wishing harm upon them is a bit too Alan Jones slash any old bloke on AM radio for me, and is bound to make it tough for you to get interviews with players or NRL types in the future. Worse, you could accidentally land someone in trouble through association. It only takes one tweet these days to cause blokes a lifetime of trouble.

Just my two cents.

 

[Tiger Shark]

Both Dan and I have done media degrees and I can tell you neither of us want to get noticed

But yes, toning the swearing is on the cards as we have a few listeners who we like that are a bit sensitive

On a positive note you've improved in that area. Your earlier episodes would have filled two swear jars.

Now half filling just the one.

 

[Sir Chadley]

Both Dan and I have done media degrees and I can tell you neither of us want to get noticed

But yes, toning the swearing is on the cards as we have a few listeners who we like that are a bit sensitive

That’s cool mate, all good.

 

[Milkshark]

So, about cutting down on the swearing, wanna start next week?

 

[snowman]

So, about cutting down on the swearing, wanna start next week?

Hahaha. See how we go.

 

[Milkshark]

Hahaha. See how we go.

When’s the pod cast going up?

 

[snowman]

Wednesday night

 

[Milkshark]

Sweet, need something to put me to sleep

jks

 

[egg]

Interesting Podcast on STATS
For example , if you get the ball back 25% of time off a short kick off , that's a win

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode?id=689779

 

[Sparkles]

Them's good odds!