Great White
Great White
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2006
- Messages
- 3,829
- Reaction score
- 40
Well at least you know when to call it quits.
You provide a definition that doesn't even make sense. :drunk
BUZ, honestly it has been something troubling me for the last couple of months, truly, I mean everyone bags Kimmorley out about inside balls, but to me you look at Cronk, Wallace, Thurston, Lockyer when they run to the line, they have 2-3 or even 4 runners either side of them and then the playmaker has the option to give it to whoever, and they are all to expect the ball, with Kimmorley, he only ever has one inside runner, now either Sticky is coaching that or the players aren't supporting Noddy and giving him those options. I just don't honestly know which one it is, but they are both plausable situations.
In regards to the word, no I don't know, but I can tell you techincally you don't want to be doing that when running lines, whether it is unders lines or overs lines, you really want to be receiving the ball simultaneously as yuo change your line, that way you committ the defenders to your intial line running direction, and also increase your chances of catching the ball, if you change your line to an overs line and receive the ball after you change your line, you are suddenly trying to catch the ball running away from it. Hope that made sense. Why do you ask anyways BUZMan?