Off - Contracted players After 08 season

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,516
Reaction score
6,324
Location
IN A BAR
recommended.gif


Yes...........BUZQuite likes both the timbre and the rhythm of that little scansion.

:nodlaugh.
You provide a definition that doesn't even make sense. :drunk

BUZWas very excited when we accidentally stumbled upon that word
 

BUZ

Paragon
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
6,091
Reaction score
124
Location
In Surgery
^ Click this link ----> scansion.

Now BUZHas helped you out (via bort) with a new word Whiter, do you reckon you can help BUZOut with one?

When the receiver changes his line just before receiving the ball......Is there a word for that?

More importantly, do you think Stuart is Coaching towards this style of play?

Kimmorley seems to get a bad wrap for his inside balls........I often wonder if it is Kimmorley, or the runners, who are predictable.
 

Great White

Great White
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
3,829
Reaction score
40
BUZ, honestly it has been something troubling me for the last couple of months, truly, I mean everyone bags Kimmorley out about inside balls, but to me you look at Cronk, Wallace, Thurston, Lockyer when they run to the line, they have 234 runners either side of them and then the playmaker has the option to give it to whoever, and they are all to expect the ball, with Kimmorley, he only ever has one inside runner, now either Sticky is coaching that or the players aren't supporting Noddy and giving him those options. I just don't honestly know which one it is, but they are both plausable situations.

In regards to the word, no I don't know, but I can tell you techincally you don't want to be doing that when running lines, whether it is unders lines or overs lines, you really want to be receiving the ball simaltaenously as yuo change your line, that way you committ the defenders to your intial line running direction, and also increase your chances of catching the ball, if you change your line to an overs line and receive the ball after you change your line, you are suddenly trying to catch the ball running away from it. Hope that made sense. Why do you ask anyways buz man?
 

BUZ

Paragon
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
6,091
Reaction score
124
Location
In Surgery
BUZ, honestly it has been something troubling me for the last couple of months, truly, I mean everyone bags Kimmorley out about inside balls, but to me you look at Cronk, Wallace, Thurston, Lockyer when they run to the line, they have 2-3 or even 4 runners either side of them and then the playmaker has the option to give it to whoever, and they are all to expect the ball, with Kimmorley, he only ever has one inside runner, now either Sticky is coaching that or the players aren't supporting Noddy and giving him those options. I just don't honestly know which one it is, but they are both plausable situations.

In regards to the word, no I don't know, but I can tell you techincally you don't want to be doing that when running lines, whether it is unders lines or overs lines, you really want to be receiving the ball simultaneously as yuo change your line, that way you committ the defenders to your intial line running direction, and also increase your chances of catching the ball, if you change your line to an overs line and receive the ball after you change your line, you are suddenly trying to catch the ball running away from it. Hope that made sense. Why do you ask anyways BUZMan?

Only the last couple of months? ;)

It's easy to bag Kimmorley..........Sh!t BUZCould even do it now :rolleyes:.

I'm looking deeper than having multiple runners..............Can you imagine the possibilities available if multiple runners all had three or four individual tricks up their sleeves? Not even the Sharks defence could cope with that onslaught :birdno!!?!??!

Simultaneous Movement* is the best phrase I can come up with that defines the play I'm talking about.....When a runner receives the ball, he deceives his defensive opposition to commit to only one line of attack, while at the same time, opens himself up to more than one attacking option.

If there's a word out there...........BUZCuriousity can't sleep until he knows what it means (puts 2 and 2 together).........and if there ain't a word.......BUZWill invent one..........Just so he can get some sleep :D.

* Usually used in a military scenario Whiter.........but when you start hearing the C9 crew using it a bit too often..........You can comfortably sit back and think to yourself "MEAnd BUZCame up with that one" :D.
 
Top