so how do you tell the full story?
i said i think jennigs has been better than them, you said he hasnt.
i showed you ways he has been better than them, you show me now how he hasnt.
isnt that the purpose of a discussion when there is a difference of opinion? i have stated my case to show why, if you dont like stats, fine, show me in another way how he hasnt been as good as those guys.
FTR, even in a well beaten team, jennings has been one of penrith best. if he got good quality ball, there isnt a centre in the league that could match him one on one.