Official Michael Ennis

[Deleted member 3365]

No carey over points means what?

It means the points from the grading of the high shot will decide whether he gets suspended or not.

Apparently he cleared his previous points from when he took an early plea for a suspension earlier this year.

Correct me if wrong.

 

[Super Impose]

No carey over points means what?

You have to accumulate 100 points to miss a week.

For instance if a previous offence saw him given 120 points, a would miss 1 week and the other 20 points would carry over.

He has no carry over points but they add on (loading) if you have more than 1 charge in the season.

Hope that makes some sense.

To some it up , I think he will be in trouble with any sort of charge because he has had at least one offence this year.

 

[Proud Shark]

So to break it down...

A grade 1 careless high tackle, which is what it should be considered, is worth 75 points.

If the player has been convicted of the same or similar offence in the two-year period immediately preceding the incident, the player is liable to an increase equivalent to 50 per cent of the base penalty for each previous offence. The exception to this rule is Grade 1 offences where the player will only carry the loading for a 12-month period.

Due to his previous high tackle offence he will be due an extra 37 points, giving him 112 total.

If the player enters an early plea to the offence and accepts the grading, the player is entitled to a reduction of 25 per cent of the base penalty and also a similar reduction in any increases due to other previous offences. A player can enter an early plea up until midday on the day following the charge.

25% reduction drops him to below 100 points with an early plea. Remembering this is IF it is a grade one offence, which would be harsh looking at it.

Hopefully this is how the judiciary sees it and he is out there next week to niggle the **** out of thurston.

 

[egg]

So to break it down...

A grade 1 careless high tackle, which is what it should be considered, is worth 75 points.



Due to his previous high tackle offence he will be due an extra 37 points, giving him 112 total.



25% reduction drops him to below 100 points with an early plea. Remembering this is IF it is a grade one offence, which would be harsh looking at it.

Hopefully this is how the judiciary sees it and he is out there next week to niggle the **** out of thurston.

Thanks . I hope you're right .

 

[Deleted member 3365]

I think the worse will be a grade one offence, other than that I think he will be playing next week.

 

[Thresher]

So to break it down...

A grade 1 careless high tackle, which is what it should be considered, is worth 75 points.



Due to his previous high tackle offence he will be due an extra 37 points, giving him 112 total.



25% reduction drops him to below 100 points with an early plea. Remembering this is IF it is a grade one offence, which would be harsh looking at it.

Hopefully this is how the judiciary sees it and he is out there next week to niggle the **** out of thurston.

any chance we can get you on the judiciary mate?

 

[Gumby]

He was going for the ball, that's the way I saw it. Shouldn't even be put on report. Inglis first tackle was way worse and only got a penalty.

Ingles should get 2-3 weeks for his careless tackles but will probably get off Scott free cause he's a ****ing protected species.

 

[sharkgaz]

Any chance that they will charge Ennis on that tackle in the first half as well?

 

[vicsharkfan]

Do we find out today or tommoz

 

[Sutty]

Today i think.

 

[Bundy Shark]

By mid to late morning they normally hand down their reports I think.

 

[HaroldBishop]

Any chance that they will charge Ennis on that tackle in the first half as well?

That's the risk. If he cops two charges he may be in trouble.

 

[gando2230]

nothing in that tackle on mcqueen ennis was just trying wrap up the ball from behind
accidental contact.

 

[djhabib]

Free to play according to twitter journos

 

[goodbyepenrithhellosharks]

Free to play according to twitter journos

hope you are on the money bud

 

[djhabib]

Yep 95 points with an early guilty plea.

 

[Greg86]

Bill Harrigan on triple m said he should be fine, hope he's right

 

[snowman]

if i wasnt in a government office i would wank wildly

 

[Tiger Shark]

if i wasnt in a government office i would wank wildly

chicken

 

[SharkShocked]

Gives you more reason to do it. Would be a better story should ACA/Media get a hold of it.