From the SMH Interesting read

bluey

Bull Shark
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
1,744
Reaction score
12
Location
New england tablelands
NRL takes steps to influence evolution of the game

Date
December 5, 2014 - 10:00PM

90 reading now
Be the first to comment

Brad Walter
Brad Walter
Sports Reporter

View more articles from Brad Walter

Follow Brad on Twitter Follow Brad on Google+ Email Brad

inShare
submit to reddit
Email article
Print
Reprints & permissions

Dying breed: James Graham is an all-playing forward.

Dying breed: James Graham is an all-playing forward. Photo: Brendan Esposito

Ordering defenders to release the ball carrier as soon as the referee has called "held", decreasing the number of interchanges and introducing stronger deterrents for lifting tackles are among the options being considered to maintain a balance between attack and defence and ensure player safety as the NRL attempts to influence how the game evolves over the next decade.

For the first time in the code's history, NRL officials have collated data demonstrating changes since 2004 and projecting what the game may look like in 2024 to determine if intervention is needed to alter trends that have led to a reduction in the number of tries, line breaks and off-loads against defences that have become more structured in the professional era.

The information was presented to the NRL competition committee on Tuesday before being dissected over two days by its 15 members, including Wayne Bennett, Tim Sheens, John Lang, Trent Robinson, Daniel Anderson, Laurie Daley, Darren Lockyer, Michael Buettner, Mark O'Neill and Tony Archer.
<i></i>

While all agreed the game is in good shape, Bennett pointed out at the meeting that not only had tries decreased from an average of 8.4 per game in 2004 to 7.3 this season and line breaks fallen even more significantly but there were some matches that featured no line breaks and the only tries were scored from kicks or a player barging over close to the line.

If left unchecked, it is predicted that tries per game could drop to 5.7 and line breaks to 5.4 within a decade.

"The last 10 years have been shaped without our input; it has just happened because we allowed it to happen," NRL head of football Todd Greenberg said. "In the next 10 years we have got to make sure that if we want certain outcomes, we make certain decisions to shape those outcomes."

The reasons identified for the shift towards defence were the more than doubling of the time – from 13 hours a week to 30 – that players now trained, technological advances, an increase in coaching staff from nine to 23 at some clubs and the increased size, strength and fitness of players, who are now full-time athletes.

A lock, who weighed 96 kilograms in 2004, is expected to be 107 kilograms in 2024, while the average weight of a fullback is forecast to increase from 84 kilograms to 96 kilograms over the same period and utility players to bulk up from 94 kilograms to 106 kilograms.

"In that 10-year period [since 2004], every club has gone forward big time and the salary cap has gone up dramatically, so every club has got the ability to spend and pay more money, and you can see the difference with the staffing and the access to facilities that players now have," Sheens said.

No decisions were made at the conference but Greenberg and his staff will now look more closely at the following key areas:

Ruck Speed

With the statistics presented to the meeting showing that fast play-the-balls had decreased from 22 per cent of tackles in 2004 to 14 per cent this season and slow play the balls were up from just 4 per cent to 10 per cent, it was suggested that referees should call "held" quicker and defenders release the ball carrier immediately rather than peel off him as they are now allowed to do.

"I think everybody probably agrees that we need to speed up the play-the-ball to give more opportunities for ad lib play," Lang said. "But it is not just the slowing down of the play-the-ball, it is actually the slowing down before they get to the ground, it is the holding them up. That is not part of the speed of the play-the-ball."

However, another statistic showing that dummy half running had decreased from an average of 54 a game in 2004 to 21 this season prompted Daley to caution against any "radical decisions" without proper consideration of the consequences.

"What that suggests is that players are running from dummy half more to try and catch people offside, so if you quicken the game up you might find it goes back to a lot of dummy half running," he said.

Interchange

The number of interchanges in 2004 was 12 compared with 10 now, but with players being fitter it is widely believed that a further reduction would help teams to unlock tiring defences and favour smaller playmakers.

"As the players get fitter, we need to make sure we continue to innovate so that fatigue plays a part in the modern game," Greenberg said.

Daley added: "If we keep going down the same path it rules out a lot of people playing our game, so I think you are better off to just decrease the interchange and that might open it up more".

Wrestling

A record 28 players were charged with wrestling offences this season and there are now an average of 12.5 (mostly legal) lifting tackles a match as defenders try to ensure the ball carrier is put on his back so he cannot play the ball quickly.

With three-man tackles now making up 35 per cent of all tackles and that ratio predicted to increase to one in two tackles, there are concerns about player safety as well as the decrease in scoring opportunities.

"In days gone by, defensive training used to comprise of tackling bags, a few tyre tubes and things like that, but the game has evolved to the point where players now spend an inordinate amount of hours working on defence and I mean defence, not tackling," Sheens said. "As well as the tackle and the wrestle and whatever, they can work as a group on the defence itself."

Lang said the players were too well versed at wrestling to eradicate it completely but dangerous tackles needed to be stamped out.

"Nobody does it on purpose but now they can't do the cannonball, some of the clubs are going in and picking one leg up and that has probably increased the potential for things to go wrong," he said.
 

bluey

Bull Shark
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
1,744
Reaction score
12
Location
New england tablelands
For me personally i believe that you can over complicates simple things so i would just drop the interchange back to 10 and see how it goes.
I would also instruct referees to penalize holding down in the ruck or slowing down the play the balls.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Messages
13,425
Reaction score
989
Location
victoria
For me personally i believe that you can over complicates simple things so i would just drop the interchange back to 10 and see how it goes.
I would also instruct referees to penalize holding down in the ruck or slowing down the play the balls.
Interchange is already 10, with barba and Holmes now in our squad I'd love to see it at 6-8, with fatigue playing a major factor teams hanging on for dear life at the end if each half.
 

endevour shark

Bull Shark
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
1,612
Reaction score
14
Location
The Shire
Interchange is already 10, with barba and Holmes now in our squad I'd love to see it at 6-8, with fatigue playing a major factor teams hanging on for dear life at the end if each half.

I believe the whole play the ball area is a disaster, to much time taken hanging on pushing down while trying to play the ball, it looks ugly with inconsistent refereeing and encourages cheating big time.

The game is also becoming dominated by bigger and bigger players rewarding size and brute strength more often than not and the stats tell the tale. It is also killing the game at a junior level where size dominates and the speedy smaller exciting players get hurt.

So Mums and dads won't let them play Aussie Rules and Soccer now get the the bulk of the kids. I think we should have less replaements and encourage a bit more skill into the game to make it quicker and even more exciting to watch.
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
24,779
Reaction score
3,452
Location
Melbourne
There's no use speeding up the play the ball when the defence doesn't have enough time to get back their 10 metres.

Already we have refs who are giving concessions to the defence and only penalising them here and there.

Bring back the 5 metre rule and then we can talk about faster play the balls.

Flat passing is also a problem IMO. It brings the offensive and defensive lines too close together and is causing a lot of the obstruction problems.

With the 5 metre rule the offense can use more depth to get their structure going if they feel they need more space.

Cut the 'flat' passing out of the game, if it doesn't look backwards it doesn't pass muster.
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
12,983
Reaction score
61
Location
Goodison
There's no use speeding up the play the ball when the defence doesn't have enough time to get back their 10 metres.

Already we have refs who are giving concessions to the defence and only penalising them here and there.

Bring back the 5 metre rule and then we can talk about faster play the balls.

Flat passing is also a problem IMO. It brings the offensive and defensive lines too close together and is causing a lot of the obstruction problems.

With the 5 metre rule the offense can use more depth to get their structure going if they feel they need more space.

Cut the 'flat' passing out of the game, if it doesn't look backwards it doesn't pass muster.
It'd be interesting to see if there were a reduction in injuries as the collisions wouldn't be as big with a 5 metre rule
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
598
Reaction score
6
I been saying for years that the interchange rule of 12 then 10 has been killing our game in terms of enterprising play from the half back and five-eigth (who are battered all day by fresh forwards off the bench).

The interchange simply has to be brought down to 6 to allow fatigue to come back into the game and open up attacking moves
 

endevour shark

Bull Shark
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
1,612
Reaction score
14
Location
The Shire
I been saying for years that the interchange rule of 12 then 10 has been killing our game in terms of enterprising play from the half back and five-eigth (who are battered all day by fresh forwards off the bench).

The interchange simply has to be brought down to 6 to allow fatigue to come back into the game and open up attacking moves

Your right on the Money Long Suffering also agree we should have another look at the at the 10 meteres and a quicker Play the ball
 

CHOGM

Great White
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
269
They need to clean up the ruck but it's very hard to do without it all coming down to each refs interpretation. I think the best way to do it is to reduce the interchange, and I'm glad guys like Joey and Gal are thinking this way. Other than AFL, team sports generally have a starting side with a few reserves and subs, but somehow league decided to have this endless interchange which basically takes the elements of fatigue and stamina out of the game. It is completely beyond me why League needs anymore than 4-6 one way subs. Once they're on they stay there. You could possibly have an extra sub in case of serious injury.

A bunch of coaches hijacked the game at some point, I think Anderson was a big part of it, and got this 10-12 man rotating interchange happening and the result was all the guys on the paddock have enough energy left to do gang tackles and wrestling, and that's all some of the do now. They don't play league, they wrestle.
 

Capital_Shark

Kitty Master
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
17,762
Reaction score
2,430
I just pray they don't over complicate things. No offense GBPHS but stuff like altering how points are awarded is exactly what we should steer clear of.

I really don't see anyway of speeding up the ruck without blowing the pea out of the whistle by penalising tacklers hanging around in the ruck, or penalising the defensive line that didn't make it back the 10 after the held call. Both of those depend too much on ref discretion too which leads to inconsistencies. No one wants more penalties or ref involvement.

So the only way I can see to open the game up a bit is to have more exhausted blokes out there - try reducing the interchange by 2 or 4 and be ready to combat the exploitation of the free concussion interchange.
 

CHOGM

Great White
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
269
I just pray they don't over complicate things. No offense GBPHS but stuff like altering how points are awarded is exactly what we should steer clear of.

I really don't see anyway of speeding up the ruck without blowing the pea out of the whistle by penalising tacklers hanging around in the ruck, or penalising the defensive line that didn't make it back the 10 after the held call. Both of those depend too much on ref discretion too which leads to inconsistencies. No one wants more penalties or ref involvement.

So the only way I can see to open the game up a bit is to have more exhausted blokes out there - try reducing the interchange by 2 or 4 and be ready to combat the exploitation of the free concussion interchange.
Interchange has to be the target for all the reasons you've outlined. I can't recall how we even ended up with this many anyway, but it's been a mistake. The best way to combat abuse of the concussion rule is to have nrl appointed independent doctors doing the assessment.
 
Top