In the early edition on Monday, before they started crucifying Bird without evidence, the geniuses at the Daily Telegraph worked out the "predicted" top eight with Broncos 4th, Roosters 5th, Raiders 6th, and Sharks 3rd. This would mean the Sharks play Raiders.
However, with the Roosters on 30, Broncos 29 and Raiders 28 premiership points, a minor miracle or two is needed for the Telegraph to be correct. The Broncos would need to win (at least) one more game than the Roosters (either two wins or one, with the Roosters winning one or none). This is quite possible. But then for the Raiders to finish behind the Roosters, they would have to lose one or both of their remaining games against the two worst teams in the comp (and/or have a 50 point turn around in differentials).
If the Roosters win both of their remaining games (v Souths and Dragons), which seems unlikely at the moment, then the Raiders will probably be 6th (or the Broncos if they lose one and the Raiders overtake them).
There is a good chance the Roosters will finish 6th or even 7th (with Dragons 6th), if they lose either of their games.
So, it really comes down to the Dragons v Roosters game. If the Dragons win, probably- Melbourne v Warriors, Manly v Roosters, Sharks v Dragons, Broncos v Raiders (played in the reverse of that order.).
If the Roosters win- Melbourne v Warriors, Manly v Dragons, Sharks v Raiders, Roosters v Broncos.
If I had to bet I'd say Sharks v Dragons.
I think they are all very winnable at home, but in terms of "recovery" to play the next week I'd rather avoid Warriors (not likely for the Sharks to face), and Broncos. Raiders, Dragons and Roosters (these days) can all play well enough, but aren't tough (as in punishing).