Official Connor Tracey

XGinga

Oceanic Whitetip Shark
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
842
Reaction score
380
Location
Penrith...
Trade him for one of the Molo brothers
No thanks to either of those. Only Dragons forward I would take is Blake Lawrie and maybe Billy burns but neither fix our issues. Billy burns would be good depth to have.
 

Gards

Jaws
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
18,390
Reaction score
1,960
Location
At the Tucky
Oh **** some hack journo has asked the Sharks to release an important in form good value depth player from our roster, better do what he says or he will write mean things about us

Who the **** these knobs think they are to dictate to us how we operate

I like Connor and wanna see him happy but end of the day he signed a contract to play for us and hasn't been quite good enough to lock down a starting spot in the centres over the big boulder with bad defense we play there. I'm pretty sure Connor was originally ear marked for centre by Fitz when his contract was extended

There is too much upside and potential in our wings and regular fullback roles for him to take one of those positions and Ramien has been playing great in the other centre position.

The value he would bring as a benchy/utility is debatable.

It makes him very good depth so the club would basically be saying to 'do the right thing' we are willing to part with good depth in our roster and take a punt on someone else (likely far less experienced) filling that role.

It compromises our squad as you need depth to get through a season.

While I never really rated Connor as a FG fullback there is no doubt he came in when Kennedy got injured and did a pretty good job of it. Without Tracey filling that FB role for us (as a depth player) I doubt we even make the finals as we would have probs dropped another game or 2.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,286
Reaction score
6,139
Location
IN A BAR
Tracey's stint at fullback showed exactly why he is valuable to us even if not in our 17.
No reason to release an asset early for no return.
 

Sharkfox

Tiger Shark
Joined
Aug 8, 2021
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
688
No thanks to either of those. Only Dragons forward I would take is Blake Lawrie and maybe Billy burns but neither fix our issues. Billy burns would be good depth to have.
Burns is off contract now, i like Lawrie but he's locked up til 2026
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,286
Reaction score
6,139
Location
IN A BAR
People suggesting Lawrie would be good for us is actually a good argument to just hold onto our current guys IMO.
Lawrie has gone pretty well the last couple seasons (ages 25 and 26) and really don't remember thinking much of him before that?
Maybe someone else happens to have paid more attention but just looked like a big plod who'd be lucky to make most teams bench for first few years, as far as I can recall. He wasn't very memorable. This was his 7th season in NRL.

Last two seasons also represent games 79 to 102 and 103 to 125, a period (around the 100 game mark) we commonly see players make a bit of a jump.

To look at our forwards...

Brit 111 games, jump taken - 5 seasons NRL
Williams 99 games, jump taken - 5* seasons NRL
BHU 99 games and some consistency away from a jump - 6* seasons of NRL
Oregon 90 games, jump... loading - 5* seasons NRL
Rudolf 81 games, lacks consistency, injury a factor - 4 seasons
Wilton 62 games, areas he needs to work on still - 3* seasons
Hunt 56 games, doesn't consistently impact NRL games - 4* seasons

*I've subtracted one if they played 5 or less games in first season, BHU I arguably could have subtracted 2 (1 game in each of first two seasons)

With some injury luck BHU, Oregon and Rudolf are all primed to be more solid on the field for us next season.
Wilton and Hunt probably another season away from their 'veteran' standard (which doesn't have to be their ceiling either).

(I know we find it hard to believe about Oregon, he was definitely very underwhelming this year I won't argue that - hoping Fitz investment pays off)
 

GF78

Hammerhead
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
365
Reaction score
231
No thanks to either of those. Only Dragons forward I would take is Blake Lawrie and maybe Billy burns but neither fix our issues. Billy burns would be good depth to have.
Blake Lawrie is the madman we could do with we can only dream.
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
People suggesting Lawrie would be good for us is actually a good argument to just hold onto our current guys IMO.
Lawrie has gone pretty well the last couple seasons (ages 25 and 26) and really don't remember thinking much of him before that?
Maybe someone else happens to have paid more attention but just looked like a big plod who'd be lucky to make most teams bench for first few years, as far as I can recall. He wasn't very memorable. This was his 7th season in NRL.


Last two seasons also represent games 79 to 102 and 103 to 125, a period (around the 100 game mark) we commonly see players make a bit of a jump.

To look at our forwards...

Brit 111 games, jump taken - 5 seasons NRL
Williams 99 games, jump taken - 5* seasons NRL
BHU 99 games and some consistency away from a jump - 6* seasons of NRL
Oregon 90 games, jump... loading - 5* seasons NRL
Rudolf 81 games, lacks consistency, injury a factor - 4 seasons
Wilton 62 games, areas he needs to work on still - 3* seasons
Hunt 56 games, doesn't consistently impact NRL games - 4* seasons

*I've subtracted one if they played 5 or less games in first season, BHU I arguably could have subtracted 2 (1 game in each of first two seasons)

With some injury luck BHU, Oregon and Rudolf are all primed to be more solid on the field for us next season.
Wilton and Hunt probably another season away from their 'veteran' standard (which doesn't have to be their ceiling either).

(I know we find it hard to believe about Oregon, he was definitely very underwhelming this year I won't argue that - hoping Fitz investment pays off)
I think Lawrie was noticeable before that. He is fairly heavily involved and I think is one of the guys who ends up with a lot of "off the ball" stats similar to Toby.

On Oregon, remember that age is also a factor. He started early and has played plenty of games, but he's still young by NRL prop standards. Imo age matters most for middles.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,286
Reaction score
6,139
Location
IN A BAR
I think Lawrie was noticeable before that. He is fairly heavily involved and I think is one of the guys who ends up with a lot of "off the ball" stats similar to Toby.

On Oregon, remember that age is also a factor. He started early and has played plenty of games, but he's still young by NRL prop standards. Imo age matters most for middles.
I haven’t somehow forgotten that

But also he’s 24 now, back end of next season 25… with a late bday maybe he belongs in the the Wilton Hunt group but he’s not young forever

Not to say a player has to follow these exact timelines but he won’t have young as an excuse after next couple seasons
 

Super Impose

Great White
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
4,711
Reaction score
771
Location
The Hill
While we all want what’s best for Connor - letting him look around for 2025 is the right move .

He is a valued and required player for 2024 so he should stay put for next year ..
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
I haven’t somehow forgotten that

But also he’s 24 now, back end of next season 25… with a late bday maybe he belongs in the the Wilton Hunt group but he’s not young forever

Not to say a player has to follow these exact timelines but he won’t have young as an excuse after next couple seasons
No - what I mean is that age matter more for Kaufusi than it does for Wilton. There are physiological reasons why bigger guys take longer.

He could be a plodder forever, but I just mean that he shouldn't be put on the same timeline as Wilton or Nikora.
 

Sevshark

Great White
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Messages
3,627
Reaction score
2,464
While we all want what’s best for Connor - letting him look around for 2025 is the right move .

He is a valued and required player for 2024 so he should stay put for next year ..

I think the Club would be happy to let him go this year but they're not just giving him a release for nothing in return, especially with no real value left on the open market for 24.
25 we can afford to do it with 13 roster spots already open and plenty of Cap for recruitment.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,286
Reaction score
6,139
Location
IN A BAR
No - what I mean is that age matter more for Kaufusi than it does for Wilton. There are physiological reasons why bigger guys take longer.

He could be a plodder forever, but I just mean that he shouldn't be put on the same timeline as Wilton or Nikora.
Players often start to impact the NRL more from 100 games onwards was never meant to be an exact science.

If you wanna model a version that accounts for position and age I’m sure I’ll read it.

Age might matter more for Kaufusi but experience in the NRL should account for something - either way I think the age excuse loses a lot of its value if he hasn’t improved in next couple years. Maybe he gets to 26 and we say ‘he’s still not that old for a middle, he can still make a jump from here’ but that’ll make for a pretty boring couple of years of him.

Brit at the top of the list and just a year older than Wilton and Oregon - younger than most of the other middles - supports the fact edge players can establish themselves a bit younger
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
Players often start to impact the NRL more from 100 games onwards was never meant to be an exact science.
(y)

If you wanna model a version that accounts for position and age I’m sure I’ll read it.
Might have to take on an apprentice for that.

Age might matter more for Kaufusi but experience in the NRL should account for something - either way I think the age excuse loses a lot of its value if he hasn’t improved in next couple years. Maybe he gets to 26 and we say ‘he’s still not that old for a middle, he can still make a jump from here’ but that’ll make for a pretty boring couple of years of him.
Yeah agreed.

Brit at the top of the list and just a year older than Wilton and Oregon - younger than most of the other middles - supports the fact edge players can establish themselves a bit younger
Closer to 2 years.

Nikora is December 97. The other two are August and September 99.
 

CHOGM

Great White
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
269
No thanks to either of those. Only Dragons forward I would take is Blake Lawrie and maybe Billy burns but neither fix our issues. Billy burns would be good depth to have.
Billy Burns was playing very, very well at the back end of the season. I’d take him straight away for Tracey. He’s an edge right? We need more of those.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,286
Reaction score
6,139
Location
IN A BAR
Billy Burns was playing very, very well at the back end of the season. I’d take him straight away for Tracey. He’s an edge right? We need more of those.
If Tracey was really trying to force his way out we could do worse
 
Top