Western Sharkie
Jaws
Points don't have to be 1 to 10, but could be 1 - 100 (or 200) to give a better scope/ more flexibility.
All player categories could have a range to allow subclasses within each class.
Eg Internationals could then be within say an 85 - 100 range depending on country, position, player etc.
Subjective yes, I agree with you, but isn't the Salary cap also subjective?
I think a player is worth X $$$ but you think he is worth Y $$$$.
If the NRL set the points for each player then at least there is some consistency in the subjectivity.
Granted its a work in progress, but I'd rather not lose players based on unlimited 3rd party $$$ which we can't compete with and is not transparent. (How do we compete with the doggies offering stupid money outside the cap through 3rd party $$$$ otherwise).
Maybe this might even things up a bit.
All player categories could have a range to allow subclasses within each class.
Eg Internationals could then be within say an 85 - 100 range depending on country, position, player etc.
Subjective yes, I agree with you, but isn't the Salary cap also subjective?
I think a player is worth X $$$ but you think he is worth Y $$$$.
If the NRL set the points for each player then at least there is some consistency in the subjectivity.
Granted its a work in progress, but I'd rather not lose players based on unlimited 3rd party $$$ which we can't compete with and is not transparent. (How do we compete with the doggies offering stupid money outside the cap through 3rd party $$$$ otherwise).
Maybe this might even things up a bit.