2023 NRL General Discussion

Sevshark

Great White
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Messages
3,687
Reaction score
2,507
Rodney Churchill is a funny bugger. Your old man played for Souths, chief, not you.

Yeah, don't understand how you think that gives your opinion any weight.

South's boycotting the Clive sounds like the biggest lie Buzz has ever come up with though.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Messages
13,429
Reaction score
994
Location
victoria
I’m a JWH fan but he gets it wrong so many times. 18 up team needs u with the chance of finals coming up
 

Super Impose

Great White
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
4,718
Reaction score
777
Location
The Hill
So looks like if we beat Raiders we will be home to Roosters or Souths week after .

Lose next week and we will be away to Raiders or Knights .

Surely we can beat Raiders for a change ?
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
15,141
Reaction score
3,627
Location
Perth WA
How has rapana even been allowed to play over the last 3 weeks?

Id be equipping the whole team with NFL helmets if he is playing against us this week.

Third week IN A ROW!
FMD!

  • Jordan Rapana (Round 24, $3000 fine – Dangerous Contact - tripping)
  • Jordan Rapana (Round 25, $3000 fine – Dangerous Contact)
  • Jordan Rapana (Raiders)Grade 1 Dangerous Contact (tripping)3rd and subsequent offenceTBC$3000 fine - 2 matches
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,346
Reaction score
6,178
Location
IN A BAR
How has rapana even been allowed to play over the last 3 weeks?

Id be equipping the whole team with NFL helmets if he is playing against us this week.
The rules?

Whether you agree or disagree by the rules no reason he shouldn’t be playing
 

sharks2010

Dribbler
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
26,493
Reaction score
1,355
Location
North western eastern
Third week IN A ROW!
FMD!

  • Jordan Rapana (Round 24, $3000 fine – Dangerous Contact - tripping)
  • Jordan Rapana (Round 25, $3000 fine – Dangerous Contact)
  • Jordan Rapana (Raiders)Grade 1 Dangerous Contact (tripping)3rd and subsequent offenceTBC$3000 fine - 2 matches
Would have been 3 straight send off back in the day
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,371
Reaction score
2,672
Would have been 3 straight send off back in the day
Yeah it's ridiculous. I understand the rules, but they need to make an amendment for repeated offenses not just being a fine. 3rd and subsequent offence in a season should be a suspension in any category.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,262
Reaction score
8,065
Location
Sydney
Yeah it's ridiculous. I understand the rules, but they need to make an amendment for repeated offenses not just being a fine. 3rd and subsequent offence in a season should be a suspension in any category.
Yep it is so stupid. Watch them change it when someone suffers a bad injury from being tripped.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,346
Reaction score
6,178
Location
IN A BAR
Yeah it's ridiculous. I understand the rules, but they need to make an amendment for repeated offenses not just being a fine. 3rd and subsequent offence in a season should be a suspension in any category.
They literally decided 3+ isn't a suspension.
They could for sure decide to change it’s not like it’s a loop hole or something they didn’t realise could happen. It’s exactly the rules they determined they wanted to use.
 
Top