$150,000 fine for salary cap breach

creg

Bull Shark
Joined
Mar 26, 2011
Messages
1,763
Reaction score
76
Location
Merimbula
Bugger

"The season from hell just got worse off the field for the Sharks with the club hit with a $150,000 salary cap breach – the most by any NRL club in a raft of fines handed down by the league.
The NRL has completed its audit and meted out punishments of $503,407 across seven clubs. The Sharks, who have been battling allegations of performance-enhancing drug use at the club, were hit with the biggest bill. Canberra ($144,393), Newcastle ($88,749), Manly ($85,00), Gold Coast ($16,217) and last-placed Parramatta ($4,700) were also fined.
The clubs have five days to challenge the fines, but the Knights have already stated they won't be doing so.
"The breach relates to the interpretation of an individual playing contract," Knight chief executive Matt Gidley said. "Our club has had extensive discussions over a long period of time to ensure future breaches in similar circumstances do not arise."
Advertisement
The Knights said both parties were confident further issues with the salary cap would not come up and that they supported the NRL's review of the cap.
The fines were imposed for a range of breaches across the top 25 squads, second-tier cap and NYC limits, with the penalties reviewed by the ARLC audit and risk committee and supported by the commission.
“The salary cap plays an incredibly important role in the competition and all clubs need to be accountable for staying within the limits of the Cap,” NRL chief operating officer Jim Doyle said. “This closeness of the competition over many years is tied directly to the fair and consistent enforcement of the salary cap rules and the effectiveness of the annual audit process.
“The fact that we are looking to review the cap going forward does not in any way alter the importance of clubs complying with the rules as they stand presently.”
Canberra boss Don Furner said his club would appeal the severity of the fine.
“We were aware of our overspend in both first tier and second tier salary caps however we will be lodging an appeal in the size of the fines and we're confident in that appeal,” Don Furner said. “This overspend related to representative bonuses, and payments to players outside the top 25 to cover long term injuries. “In 2012 we had to activate a number of clauses in younger player's contracts, as we needed to fill the positions left vacant by long term injuries to our top squad.
“Breaches of the lower-tier cap related to a number of allowances to our second tier players. We will be lodging an appeal this afternoon based on the fines issued to us.”
 

Gards

Jaws
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
18,364
Reaction score
1,906
Location
At the Tucky
Gunna have to drink alot of VB at the games to get that sort of money back into the Sharkies bank account!
 

HITMAN

Bull Shark
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
10
God we always get the rough end of the pineapple whenever they're being handed out.
 

Gards

Jaws
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
18,364
Reaction score
1,906
Location
At the Tucky
I reckon we can get that $150k down to about $140k by the end of the night hahaha even without Sharks2010
 

DANGA HATCH

Grey Nurse
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
558
Reaction score
11
Interesting that the two sides who get the least exposure to free to air TV ( thus limited free advertising) have the two biggest fines. For mine the lack of a level playing field in regard to marketing, exposure and advertising make this game seriously rigged toward the rich clubs. Salary cap breaches are probably the only way we can level this out but rules are rules I suppose.

Like everything else that comes with being a Sharkies supporter, I'll just have to suck it up.
 

Gil

Sharkaholic
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
9,617
Reaction score
96
Location
Area 51
What pisses me off is every time we have a good story to come out of the club, straight away there is some sort of bad press.
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,406
Reaction score
761
Location
NSW
is this in regards to the 3rd party payments issue we've heard about for a while, or just a full on cap breach? Either way I think it shows the club is in no place to go signing marquee players for a few seasons, no Marshall etc. We will need to pretty much replace blokes who are over paid with blokes who will actually deserve that salary
 

endevour

Bronze Whaler
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
is this in regards to the 3rd party payments issue we've heard about for a while, or just a full on cap breach? Either way I think it shows the club is in no place to go signing marquee players for a few seasons, no Marshall etc. We will need to pretty much replace blokes who are over paid with blokes who will actually deserve that salary

Certainly looks like we have been paying overs for some of our players To be over the salary cap is very very bad management. Lets hope the new Management team can do the job in a professional way.

We really can not afford for this to happen particularly given the debt levels we still have and the message this sends out to sponsors and potential players .

Bogga Bri
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,406
Reaction score
761
Location
NSW
Certainly looks like we have been paying overs for some of our players To be over the salary cap is very very bad management. Lets hope the new Management team can do the job in a professional way.

We really can not afford for this to happen particularly given the debt levels we still have and the message this sends out to sponsors and potential players .

Bogga Bri

I think part of the problem is guys like Toupo who is in the final year of his original inflated contract, i think him re-signing on a reasonable amount of coin are the things that are going to help up get below, that and the cap increase
 

Frenzy

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
1,648
Reaction score
169
FFS this is a nothing story.

Was reported before a ball was kicked in anger. It's about a third party payment made which wasn't reported. Guess who reported it to the NRL when it was discovered? The Sharks did.

Blame E Group, not the Sharks. This is why they got the rocket from their security contract.
 
Top