HaroldBishop
Megalodon
Enjoyed his battle with Wighton, both big strong lads having a real crack.
Enjoyed it even better, after the winEnjoyed his battle with Wighton, both big strong lads having a real crack.
He's come up against some decent centre opposition & come out on top so farEnjoyed his battle with Wighton, both big strong lads having a real crack.
Yup!Now that I’ve had some time to reflect, that penalty on him was still horseshit
Don’t forget, he had some time at Fullback as well, which can inflate your run metresWighton racked up a fair amount metres out of shear grit and determination but had the 2nd worst tackle % on the park so our edge gave him some trouble and he wasn't the biggest threat attacking wise in that game to us.
If he were still a Raider he would have put 3 trys on us though
Don’t forget, he had some time at Fullback as well, which can inflate your run metres
Sure did. Been great all season.Played well last night.
he has been good. Love Jesse (except when there is a brain fade) however, at the end of the day he loves this club and is passionate when he plays for us. thats for sure.Played well last night.
As soon as the Video Ref start sayings things like "In my opinion..." it's a joke.he has been good. Love Jesse (except when there is a brain fade) however, at the end of the day he loves this club and is passionate when he plays for us. thats for sure.
that penalty as a disruptor - now that I watched with sound, just wow!
oh well, move on
Bunker rulings are substandard and needs a major overhaulAs soon as the Video Ref start sayings things like "In my opinion..." it's a joke.
Bunker isn't done any favours by poor rules though... that a ref or the bunker is forced to rule on intent to strip, or intent to disrupt goes to show there is a bigger problem.Bunker is substandard and needs a major overhaul
“in my opinion”
It’s the bunker’s interpretation of the rule and the “lack of feel” for the game itself.Bunker isn't done any favours by poor rules though... that a ref or the bunker is forced to rule on intent to strip, or intent to disrupt goes to show there is a bigger problem.
Not denying the bunker has a lack of feel for the game, but Uncle Graham is happy to back them in most of the time.It’s the bunker’s interpretation of the rule and the “lack of feel” for the game itself.
Its interpretation and being consistent (or more-so inconsistent) that pisses people off. Not necessarily the rules themselves.
They lack the knowledge of the “intent” of the rule and make questionable decisions.
One day they rule this way, the next, the opposite way.
Thats on the person in the bunker. Not on the rules.
I 100% agree with you in how they currently interpret the rule.Not denying the bunker has a lack of feel for the game, but Uncle Graham is happy to back them in most of the time.
As for interpretation of the rules, IMO the disrupter rule is garbage, no matter how its interpreted.
If 16 out of 17 clubs fans thinks it’s a **** call, it’s a **** call.I understand everyone's frustration with the ref, rules and bunker but for every decision made that people get the dirts with there is an equal number of people who think the decision was right.