Western Sharkie
Jaws
He’s fine
He’s fine
Rodney Churchill is a funny bugger. Your old man played for Souths, chief, not you.
Wont be playing next week. The trials at beginning of next season will probably count in his suspension, Roosters will try and pull a shifty to make them countI see JWH was using his head again last night.
Wont be playing next week. The trials at beginning of next season will probably count in his suspension, Roosters will try and pull a shifty to make them count
Suck sht !Not this time ..
A LONG time coming
‘Got what he deserved’: Roosters disaster as NRL hands down monster SIX-game ban
‘Got what he deserved’: Roosters’ disaster as star slapped with SIX-game banwww.foxsports.com.au
The grub should get a longer holidaySuck sht !
3 kiwis games may count. Think max 1 trial can countWont be playing next week. The trials at beginning of next season will probably count in his suspension, Roosters will try and pull a shifty to make them count
Long as he gets at least two in case we play them again week one.
Rapana?
He’s fine
How has rapana even been allowed to play over the last 3 weeks?
Id be equipping the whole team with NFL helmets if he is playing against us this week.
Jordan Rapana (Raiders) | Grade 1 Dangerous Contact (tripping) | 3rd and subsequent offence | TBC | $3000 fine - 2 matches |
The rules?How has rapana even been allowed to play over the last 3 weeks?
Id be equipping the whole team with NFL helmets if he is playing against us this week.
Early guilty plea (3 weeks) plus trying to get a downgrade (fine / additional 4 weeks if not successful)The grub should get a longer holiday
Would have been 3 straight send off back in the dayThird week IN A ROW!
FMD!
- Jordan Rapana (Round 24, $3000 fine – Dangerous Contact - tripping)
- Jordan Rapana (Round 25, $3000 fine – Dangerous Contact)
Jordan Rapana (Raiders) Grade 1 Dangerous Contact (tripping) 3rd and subsequent offence TBC $3000 fine - 2 matches
Yeah it's ridiculous. I understand the rules, but they need to make an amendment for repeated offenses not just being a fine. 3rd and subsequent offence in a season should be a suspension in any category.Would have been 3 straight send off back in the day
Yep it is so stupid. Watch them change it when someone suffers a bad injury from being tripped.Yeah it's ridiculous. I understand the rules, but they need to make an amendment for repeated offenses not just being a fine. 3rd and subsequent offence in a season should be a suspension in any category.
They literally decided 3+ isn't a suspension.Yeah it's ridiculous. I understand the rules, but they need to make an amendment for repeated offenses not just being a fine. 3rd and subsequent offence in a season should be a suspension in any category.
No it wouldn’t……He wouldn’t have made the game week 2Would have been 3 straight send off back in the day