2020 NRL General Discussion

egg

Jaws
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
1,039
Siebs offered 1 million pay out to pizz orf from Broncos
 

CHOGM

Great White
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
269
Watching the game again, I gotta say, the stripping rule is the shame of the league at the moment. The Moylan strip was just bull****. What is the rule? A second panther still had contact with Moylan when the strip took place, so is he deemed to not be in the tackle because of what? What is classified as “in the tackle”? It’s the most important part of the rule but it has no clarity, it’s just ref interpretation which is garbage.

The rule should be “one on one tackle”, not “there where three on one till a split second before the strip then there was one left”. I just can’t see what it adds to the game in its current shape.

If it stays this way, it’ll lead to attacking players deliberately releasing the ball before the players drop off if they sense a strip move on. If teams perfect that move in attack, then it’s just a boring **** show of stripping strategy. It’s not what fans turn up to watch.

Captains should be able to challenge it, and if on replay a second defender still had any contact with the attacker, then it’s a strip penalty against.

That said we’re going to have to start doing it too or anticipating when it’s on, because it hurt us last night.
 

CHOGM

Great White
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
269
Further to the strip rule-
Watching the woods strip, Martin is basically using the other two tacklers to help him set up for the strip, then once woods is awkwardly falling and puts a hand out, they drop off.

So it isn’t one on one. Without the other two in the tackle earlier, the strip never happens. It’s a piece of **** rule.
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
24,804
Reaction score
3,468
Location
Melbourne
Watching the game again, I gotta say, the stripping rule is the shame of the league at the moment. The Moylan strip was just bull****. What is the rule? A second panther still had contact with Moylan when the strip took place, so is he deemed to not be in the tackle because of what? What is classified as “in the tackle”? It’s the most important part of the rule but it has no clarity, it’s just ref interpretation which is garbage.

The rule should be “one on one tackle”, not “there where three on one till a split second before the strip then there was one left”. I just can’t see what it adds to the game in its current shape.

If it stays this way, it’ll lead to attacking players deliberately releasing the ball before the players drop off if they sense a strip move on. If teams perfect that move in attack, then it’s just a boring **** show of stripping strategy. It’s not what fans turn up to watch.

Captains should be able to challenge it, and if on replay a second defender still had any contact with the attacker, then it’s a strip penalty against.

That said we’re going to have to start doing it too or anticipating when it’s on, because it hurt us last night.

I was thinking about this after the game.

Like all rules there are coaches and players that will learn to exploit it.

I wouldn't mind there being a facet to the rule which stated that if players drop off intentionally in order to facilitate a one on one strip, that a penalty goes to the team that was stripped.

It's gotten a bit ridiculous and shouldn't be as important to the game as an attacking kick, attacking set move etc.

(I'll admit that I probably wouldn't be as worried about it if we weren't such easy prey.)
 

egg

Jaws
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
1,039
I could cope with a one on one strip being part of the game.
But as soon as two or more involved in a tackle, shouldn't be allowed. Makes it easier for Refs .
This drop off rule sux , even IF Sharks were good at it
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,161
Reaction score
7,965
Location
Sydney
I could cope with a one on one strip being part of the game.
But as soon as two or more involved in a tackle, shouldn't be allowed. Makes it easier for Refs .
This drop off rule sux , even IF Sharks were good at it

This is what the rule used to be and people complained about it.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
15,091
Reaction score
3,583
Location
Perth WA
I could cope with a one on one strip being part of the game.
But as soon as two or more involved in a tackle, shouldn't be allowed. Makes it easier for Refs .
This drop off rule sux , even IF Sharks were good at it



This is what the rule used to be and people complained about it.

A strong organisation would admit the change was wrong and would revert back next season!
I'm one that hopes that's what they do.
 

egg

Jaws
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
1,039
Imagine going from a Broncos head coach salary to a Cronulla assistant’s salary.

Lol.

He’ll need that payout

Be like the Broncos paying a players Cap that they want moved on .

Assist coach $350 / year for next 3 years = 1.05 MIL
Broncos pay 1 MIL we pay 50K
At least keeps Seibs in the game , good luck otherwise

PS : Just look at how well the Broncos defence is going ;)
 

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
464
Location
General Admission
Be like the Broncos paying a players Cap that they want moved on .

Assist coach $350 / year for next 3 years = 1.05 MIL
Broncos pay 1 MIL we pay 50K
At least keeps Seibs in the game , good luck otherwise

PS : Just look at how well the Broncos defence is going ;)

Need Flanno to negotiate it and get them to throw Alfie in to run the drinks.
 
Top