HaroldBishop
Megalodon
Brandy says whatever is anti-shark.
He really doesn't.
Brandy says whatever is anti-shark.
He really doesn't.
he does mate
he hates us - a group of fans trashed his mums house after a game
Yeah I know but I just don't hear it during his commentary.
I honestly don't know how you could miss it.
He gets actually angry. He sounds like an angry old man, fussing over some **** because he didn't understand the rules.
I used to like him but he's losing the plot.
He lashed Fifita hard when he did his flop/crusher earlier in the season like it was the most intentionally dangerous thing he's seen in sport.
He was really carrying on about something yesterday too although I can't remember what at the moment.
He lashed Fifita hard when he did his flop/crusher earlier in the season like it was the most intentionally dangerous thing he's seen in sport.
He was really carrying on about something yesterday too although I can't remember what at the moment.
I'm not sure if he's actually got a bias or not, but he is often an annoying commentator. So is Anasta. They 'blow up' at things because they've missed something crucial, and they dead set act like they were personally affronted.
He didn't like that the refs knew the rules and correctly penalised a voluntary tackle.
To be fair on the commentators I don’t think they actually realised what the penalty was for.
No one is as bad as this dopey ****. No one.
I audibly laughed when he played it, like I knew straight away he'd done the wrong thing even before the penalty was blown. These guys are literally paid to commentate Rugby League and were scratching their heads.
Yeah - fair call. I was the same. If us two know the rule it’s probably reasonable to expect them to know it.
Tbh I don’t think most commentators have much of an idea of the actual rules outside of the ones everyone knows or the ones that have been highlighted recently.
Couldn't he just claim that he was passing the ball to the player behind him in an unusual way? As long as he didn't knock the ball on couldn't the play the ball be regarded as a strange backwards kick?
No, the reason the rule exists is that it otherwise leads to touch football style tactics where you go for a hitup, get tackled intentionally and get a quick play the ball while the other side is almost entirely offside.
Billy Slater used to sort of half do it and get away with it. He'd get down to his knees then immediately fight his way to his feet and play the ball. The getting down to his knees part being effectively a voluntary tackle. I hated that he got away with it and that no one was even talking about it. It's almost as bad as wrestling. It's just more manipulating the ruck outside of the spirit of the game to get an unfair advantage.