evertonshark
Jaws
Our wingers and centres tonight:
Capewell 251 metres
Leutele 169
Feki 162
Lee 143.
That's some solid metres
Capewell 251 metres
Leutele 169
Feki 162
Lee 143.
That's some solid metres
he's walking the tight rope between reserve grade and firsts, hard to blame him if confidence a little down and doesn't want to risk an error or going into touch but I didn't really see him as having those chances in the corner myself, he handled the situations well in attack and monstered nigama a few times on kick chase tackles as wellI thought Lee lacked a bit of confidence at times. There were two occasions in the first half where if he pinned his ears back and went for the corner he probably scores.
Our wingers and centres tonight:
Capewell 251 metres
Leutele 169
Feki 162
Lee 143.
That's some solid metres
I know Capewell is better suited to back row.
I know the opposition was not great tonight.
But there can be no way that Beale beats Capewell to a spot next week .
I do not care what number he wears.
Lets not wait for Beale to cost us a game, it has nearly happened on multiple occasions.
Flanno said in the press conference that he is about due for a spot in the top 17. I think it's going to be Beale who's spot he takes
Food for thought - leave the right side as it was tonight and have bird come off the bench. I'm sure there are pros and cons to that like birds defence is generally spot on and capewell did get burnt on the outside by wighton earlier in the year etcCapewell doesn't play on the wing and neither do Leutele or Bird, so how does Capewell take Beale's spot?
Capewell doesn't play on the wing and neither do Leutele or Bird, so how does Capewell take Beale's spot?
Capewell's spot, would be what Beales spot should be, on the bench.Capewell doesn't play on the wing and neither do Leutele or Bird, so how does Capewell take Beale's spot?
I think if he was looking at the ball or looking up, he'd get called for double movement. His head was down made it seem like he was in the motion a bit more. Was 50/50 for mine but I'm glad we got the callCapewells second try, was he lucky or was it a fair try just momentum?
Slow motion for me it looked like a double movement, I'd given up seeing that sloew replay to be honest. fast motion full speed when I saw it again it certainly looked a fair enough try. They must have gone by the full speed replay in the end.I think if he was looking at the ball or looking up, he'd get called for double movement. His head was down made it seem like he was in the motion a bit more. Was 50/50 for mine but I'm glad we got the call
didnt think it was going to go our way. I was very surprised when they mentioned they were looking at the grounding. Happy with the result but I'm sure I'd be pissed if it were the other way aroundSlow motion for me it looked like a double movement, I'd given up seeing that sloew replay to be honest. fast motion full speed when I saw it again it certainly looked a fair enough try. They must have gone by the full speed replay in the end.
It looked like Brooks (?) sliding in actually pushed Capewell's arm over the line from one of the angles.Capewells second try, was he lucky or was it a fair try just momentum?