CrazyMatt
Jaws
Serious question:
Would us having Nicho in Round 1 seen us closer to a win or would we still have suffered defeat?
Maybe a little. But Trindall was very good in his absence so maybe not. Feel like we lost for other reasons.
Serious question:
Would us having Nicho in Round 1 seen us closer to a win or would we still have suffered defeat?
We didn’t lose because of Trindall but Hynes might have made up for the reasons we lost potentially in my opinionMaybe a little. But Trindall was very good in his absence so maybe not. Feel like we lost for other reasons.
Who can say, mate. But if history is anything to go by... well, round 1 history... nopeSerious question:
Would us having Nicho in Round 1 seen us closer to a win or would we still have suffered defeat?
there is no way to say he would or wouldnt haveHynes wouldn't have won that game for us.
Agree. Trindall didnt touch the ball in the 2nd halfthere is no way to say he would or wouldnt have
for mine, if hynes plays we are ahead at the break and its a different ball game in the second half
its the little things, i bet anything that the touchie doesnt call that pass to katoa forward if hynes thrrows it
i also bet we are better at building pressure with hynes there
we may still have lost, but we would have capitalised on more if he played
Pretty hard to touch the ball when every other **** drops it before it gets too youAgree. Trindall didnt touch the ball in the 2nd half
Worth notingPretty hard to touch the ball when every other **** drops it before it gets too you
100%Pretty hard to touch the ball when every other **** drops it before it gets too you
Yeah maybethere is no way to say he would or wouldnt have
for mine, if hynes plays we are ahead at the break and its a different ball game in the second half
its the little things, i bet anything that the touchie doesnt call that pass to katoa forward if hynes thrrows it
i also bet we are better at building pressure with hynes there
we may still have lost, but we would have capitalised on more if he played
he was nailing them in the dogs gameYeah maybe
Hynes maybe also doesn't convert the goals Trindall did.
Surely this is a big generalisation. I can tell you he definitely touched it at least once. When he failed to find touch!Agree. Trindall didnt touch the ball in the 2nd half
I wonder if that technically goes down as a touch or a kick or nothing as it is part of a set restart.Surely this is a big generalisation. I can tell you he definitely touched it at least once. When he failed to find touch!
Mate, I was having a joke....I wonder if that technically goes down as a touch or a kick or nothing as it is part of a set restart.
A tap wouldn't count as a kick but presumably is a touch as the ball becomes live while you have it. Does the ball become live while the kicker has it? Nobody can do anything with it until after the point it has been kicked at which stage Trindall no longer has it...
More in-depth than I think you were trying to go with the comment...
And that was a relatively short response from @bortMate, I was having a joke....
I knew that but didn't realise we weren't allowed to respond to those.Mate, I was having a joke....
I believe it would have counted as a complete setI wonder if that technically goes down as a touch or a kick or nothing as it is part of a set restart.
A tap wouldn't count as a kick but presumably is a touch as the ball becomes live while you have it. Does the ball become live while the kicker has it? Nobody can do anything with it until after the point it has been kicked at which stage Trindall no longer has it...
More in-depth than I think you were trying to go with the comment...
A complete set for the penalty and then an incomplete one for not kicking it out?I believe it would have counted as a complete set
There wasn't much to ruin mateA complete set for the penalty and then an incomplete one for not kicking it out?
Sorry if I have ruined your joke