BurgoShark
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 12,868
- Reaction score
- 4,097
No reason why he couldn’t play the first 20 minutes there - it’s hard for the #9 to play the full 80 with all the tackling required..Looking forward to seeing him go again next year. Would like him to start at 9 though but don’t see it happening.
Agreed mate.No reason why he couldn’t play the first 20 minutes there - it’s hard for the #9 to play the full 80 with all the tackling required..
Yep, it’s not like we’re wasting a bench spot for nothing neitherNo reason why he couldn’t play the first 20 minutes there - it’s hard for the #9 to play the full 80 with all the tackling required..
anything to keep brailey off the fieldLooking forward to seeing him go again next year. Would like him to start at 9 though but don’t see it happening.
You can be the one to tell him. I’ll stand back and watchShould never be allowed to take a crash play run ever again.
Yeah I definitely think he needs to do less one out hitups.He is what he is. I reckon that's about the 10th one he's come up 1 inch or a bobble from scoring for us. A more composed PTB with 24s before HT 3m out would be great but again, he is what he is.
Need to use that redlining run more, make him a little more space. Turn him under a bit. Outside inside ball round the middle.
Agree , yet many on here want him replacing Brailey or being our starting No 9 .This guy gives me 2013/14 Gal vibes. Tries really hard but overplays his hand by making dumb errors too regularly
For the first 15 minutes it actually makes sense him playing 9.Agree , yet many on here want him replacing Brailey or being our starting No 9 .
No doubt he had eyes for the ball but He ran two meters past it…about time an iffy one went our way.Couldn't understand the carry on from the commentators regarding the try. 100% had eyes only for the footy, no way that's a penalty.
Two metres past it? Don't think so.No doubt he had eyes for the ball but He ran two meters past it…about time an iffy one went our way.