Look up the meaning of objective
If the coach is then Tracey will be down the list of viable options. If he wants to be 'loyal' or take a punt he can elevate Tracey but Kennedy and Hynes have runs and form on the board in the 1 (Tracey doesn't and hasn't shown potential for this position either) and Moylan has experience even if he breaks down every 3rd week
The only one that can realistically put pressure on Kennedy will be Hynes, MAYBE Metcalf further into the future
I know what it means, I'm just not convinced Fitz couldn't be objective and still come up with a slightly different list to you.
You're saying Kennedy and Hynes are 1 and 2 because they have runs on the board at the position but it could also be fair to say Tracey has runs in the NRL over Metcalf.
Maybe Fitz considers it a fact not an opinion that Moylan's legs are more glass than JT13s hands and so would rank him lower due to risk of injury.
Similarly Hynes has performed very well at fullback also, perhaps Fitz would actually objectively rank him 1 and Kennedy 2. And then even still play Hynes in halves because we need him there more.
Not sure by what definition of loyalty we would see Fitz running Tracey at 1 ahead of Kennedy or Hynes, that is definitely a decision I would seriously question.
