ChatGPT is the most positive mother ****er and even it thinks it stinks:
What Ben Barba Brings / What He’s Good At
- Elite fullback/fullback‑adjacent skills
- Barba has been one of the most dynamic attacking fullbacks in the modern era: great under the high ball, elusive footwork, an ability to read the game, break lines, support play, good speed, agility.
- He won the Dally M Medal in 2012 (best player in the league) at fullback, which suggests a high level of understanding and execution of what a fullback needs to do in attack and in general involvement.
- Experience in different environments
- He’s played at multiple clubs in the NRL, moved to England (St Helens) and had success there (Super League, Man of Steel etc.), so he has exposure to different styles, perhaps different coaching methods and expectations.
- Coming back from adversity, dealing with off‑field pressures, and talking publicly about mistakes might make him more empathetic and able to guide younger players about what to do — and what not to do.
- High ceiling for what fullbacks can do
- Barba’s attacking creativity, his vision and flair (when focussed) show what a fullback could be: more than just safe under the high ball, more than just defence; a playmaker, a threat on breaks, someone who can influence the game.
- Credibility
- Because Barba has been at the top, he has inherent credibility. Players often respond well to people who’ve “been there, done that,” particularly in the same position.
Risks / Cons & Things to Watch Out For
- Off‑field issues and reputation
- Barba’s career has been marred by various off‑field controversies: breaches of club codes of conduct; issues with substance use; domestic violence allegations; behavioural problems.
- He also tested positive for cocaine after the Sharks’ 2016 premiership win and was released from the club.
- Stability / consistency
- Barba’s form and behaviour over time have been inconsistent, both because of external (off‑field) issues and perhaps psychological pressure.
- If a mentor is to guide someone regularly, you want someone with consistency and reliability. There is risk Barba himself may not be in a position (emotionally, professionally, personally) to deliver that consistently.
- Also, potential for distraction: media attention, old controversies, could become more of a liability than an asset.
- Public perception / culture risk
- Bringing someone with Barba’s background into a mentoring/coaching role might cause backlash. There are stakeholders (fans, sponsors, media) who may be uneasy about past behaviour.
- Also, for younger players, the example set must be high standard not just on field but off field.
- Regulatory / legal risks
- There may be sanctions or restrictions from past NRL or legal penalties. For example, whether Barba is able to be officially employed, admitted to official coaching roles, whether the NRL would permit it, whether there are integrity/fitness for role issues.
- Also, if a mentor is to have access to players, training sessions etc, the club must ensure insurance, reputation, duty of care issues are covered.
- Potential mismatch in coaching skills
- Being an excellent player doesn’t automatically make someone a good coach or mentor. It requires teaching skills, communication skills, patience, ability to analyse, plan, and provide consistent feedback.
- There’s no strong public record of Barba doing those mentoring/coaching roles at a high level. It’s possible but unproven.
Weighing Up: Would I Employ Him (for Will Kennedy’s Development)?
If I were in charge of Cronulla Sharks, deciding whether to bring Barba in to mentor Will Kennedy, here is how I’d think:
- Yes, I might consider it, but only under strict conditions — it's not a no‑brainer.
The upside is compelling: Barba’s skills, vision, past success, and firsthand knowledge could be hugely beneficial for a young fullback who wants to lift speed, awareness, attacking flair.
However, I’d only do it if Barba could satisfy certain criteria:
- Demonstrated personal rehabilitation and stability
- I’d want to see sustained evidence that Barba has addressed his past issues (substance, behavioural, legal) — in terms of lifestyle, mental health, accountability.
- Defined role & boundaries
- The mentoring role should be clearly scoped: maybe specific skills sessions (attacking awareness, reading defensive lines, positioning under kicks), rather than being given general coaching authority unless he has formal coaching credentials.
- Support structure & coaching accreditation
- It would be helpful if Barba is given coaching training, or associating with experienced coaching staff, so that he can translate his playing intuition into coaching/mentoring.
- Contract and expectations
- Include in contract expectations about behaviour, presence, professionalism, possibly off‑field support (counselling etc.).
- Monitoring and reporting
- Regular reviews: on‑field contribution to Will’s development, off‑field behaviour, feedback from Will and coaches and whether it's helping.