Official Wade Graham

  • Thread starter Deleted member 3365
  • Start date
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
12,066
Reaction score
61
Jez can probably pull 80 when we are desperate, fifita can pull 60 quality, he could pull 80 but not a good 80. I think we will again be set for the backrow for a few more years

I was watching jez closely against the storm and after about 30mins he was close to passing out!
 

Jigsaw

Jaws
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
49
Location
Redcliffe
Just a question.... If we had to choose between keeping Graham or Keeping JB... who would people go with?
 

shire1976

Hammerhead
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
320
Reaction score
8
My mail is the real story is Penrith has discussed bringing Wade back but for the money he is asking, he isn't viewed as their best option. Unlikely to be offered a contract there.
 

scott17

Great Scott
Joined
Apr 16, 2007
Messages
3,770
Reaction score
45
Location
Camden
yeah righto it's a joke, who doesn't pay out penrith?

i was mucking around haha... the 'riff has its moments, the only time i used to go there was for aquagolf and when my iphone ****ed up id take it to the apple shop there.. thats about it for the old riff - not the biggest fan though ;)
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
12,066
Reaction score
61
Sunny day, Versing best team in the comp and he had extra responsibility, not fair to judge IMO

okay if he can play the full game against parramatta on a freezing winters night we'll classify him as an 80 minute player :rolleyes:

i was mucking around haha... the 'riff has its moments, the only time i used to go there was for aquagolf and when my iphone ****ed up id take it to the apple shop there.. thats about it for the old riff - not the biggest fan though ;)

haha
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
5,959
Reaction score
64
Location
Brisbane
We have enough players off contract to keep him I guess but I doubt Flano will pay overs for him and we don't need to get into that kind of a **** fight either that Penrith are in with back ended contracts he is a priority as most of you say but he also is replaceable if need be it would be a shame though I do like the guy and would prefer him to stay.

We need backs so changes are going to happen.
 

Blair

Bull Shark
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
154
As much as I rate Wade as a great talent, I wouldn't want to sacrifice our good depth to keep him.
 

DeathMoth

Great White
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
3,559
Reaction score
61
Location
Sydney
As much as I rate Wade as a great talent, I wouldn't want to sacrifice our good depth to keep him.

so you wouldn't sacrifice players who are behind him in the pecking order? you'd keep lesser players and allow him to go somewhere else? that's weird.

Wade is a talent and still so young, he's the kind of guy you'd want here long term. He's probably got the right build to become an excellent and tough second rower or lock, in the vein of Gallen. and in a few years when Gal's time is up, we're going to need a competitor like Graham to take his place. i say keep Graham even if it means putting him on a solid salary; i'd lean towards a modest but incrementally increasing salary with incentives, but at least 4 years. lock him down, let him get on with his footy and say if he wants the extra moola to ****in earn it
 
Top