SHARKS FOREVER NRL SUPERCOACH 2026

Sevshark said:
Neither does my cup opponent
Click to expand...
FB been a cursed spot for me. Started with Ponga, moved to Walsh and then to turbo

Should probably just go with the historical data and steer clear of Turbo and Ponga but they suck you in
 
Flanno said:
FB been a cursed spot for me. Started with Ponga, moved to Walsh and then to turbo

Should probably just go with the historical data and steer clear of Turbo and Ponga but they suck you in
Click to expand...

have owned all 3 plus started with Drinky and brought him back this week
 
I have Weekes at fullback. Still scratching my head at how he only scored 68 points last week with two tries and that 100m line break.

To illustrate my point, I had Chester last night, he didn't score a try, dropped a heap of ball and yet still scores the same as Weekes. I know he made a couple of line breaks but he should not have scored the same as Weekes surely.
 
Sir Chadley said:
I have Weekes at fullback. Still scratching my head at how he only scored 68 points last week with two tries and that 100m line break.

To illustrate my point, I had Chester last night, he didn't score a try, dropped a heap of ball and yet still scores the same as Weekes. I know he made a couple of line breaks but he should not have scored the same as Weekes surely.
Click to expand...

Weekes' 0 tackles to Chester's 20 is probably a big reason

Weekes workrate is where he is letting you down mostly, take a look at how many runs he's having a game compared to the rest of his back 5 and other fullbacks.
 
Last edited:
Sevshark said:
Weekes' 0 tackles to Chester's 20 is probably a big reason

Weekes workrate is where he is letting you down mostly, take a look at how many runs he's having a game compared to the rest of his back 5 and other fullbacks.
Click to expand...
Yep, there's 20 points right there I guess with the tackles. But he ran the ball 9 times with 209 run metres, surely that counts for something along with his two tries and the line break?

Two tries is 34 points, more than 8 run metres is 2 points - actually, yes, there's not much else is there?

I'll keep him, Storm aren't going amazingly and Raiders are at home so I'll see how he goes before offloading him.
 
Sir Chadley said:
I have Weekes at fullback. Still scratching my head at how he only scored 68 points last week with two tries and that 100m line break.

To illustrate my point, I had Chester last night, he didn't score a try, dropped a heap of ball and yet still scores the same as Weekes. I know he made a couple of line breaks but he should not have scored the same as Weekes surely.
Click to expand...
Take out the line break that would surely be needed to run 100m, and any try, and it’s 1 point. Obviously those other things (line break and try) give great points but for running 100m? 1 point

If Chester runs 8m or more 10 times that’s already 20 points, despite only maybe being roughly the same amount of total meters.

As Sev said, work rate is a massive part of scoring
 
bort said:
Take out the line break that would surely be needed to run 100m, and any try, and it’s 1 point. Obviously those other things (line break and try) give great points but for running 100m? 1 point

If Chester runs 8m or more 10 times that’s already 20 points, despite only maybe being roughly the same amount of total meters.

As Sev said, work rate is a massive part of scoring
Click to expand...

Chester closer to 20 runs a game, more opportunity to get attacking stats on the back of that as well
 
Flanno said:
108 is still a great score though
Click to expand...
Yeh, still happy with it, especially with having just brought him in. Usually there's that ''chasing points' dip!

Ended up not looping and left the C on Cleary, so a decent SC night all round
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top