Official Shark Park & Woolooware Bay Development

  • Thread starter Thread starter SF
  • Start date Start date
Thread Info
Summary of Leagues Club Plans
SF said:
You're thinking of North Cronulla, there was some links between the building companies. But this is probably a topic best not covered here, it's always a risk of litigation.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty close to it all so am happy to explain if people want to DM me
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SF

Would like to see Wade Graham involved in the board/management one day.

The thing about the media room, it may be a whinge, but we should be making improvements in that regard, there’s no excuses why some of the facilities in the ET Stand can’t be improved. Even the sponsor boxes are pretty dated.
 
SF said:

Would like to see Wade Graham involved in the board/management one day.

The thing about the media room, it may be a whinge, but we should be making improvements in that regard, there’s no excuses why some of the facilities in the ET Stand can’t be improved. Even the sponsor boxes are pretty dated.
Click to expand...

You’d upgrade the boxes way before you even gave the media rooms a consideration. They are there to work and need to be there. Sponsors can choose to not come or pay so screw the media

Also he’s being a bit of a diva. No kettle… piss off
 
Tiger Shark said:
You’d upgrade the boxes way before you even gave the media rooms a consideration. They are there to work and need to be there. Sponsors can choose to not come or pay so screw the media

Also he’s being a bit of a diva. No kettle… piss off
Click to expand...
The media shape the opinions though. I've heard in the past on the radio when they'll talk glowingly about a club, just because they put on a good lunch for them. Plus it's just basic attention to detail, there are lots of areas of the ground that could easily be improved with a simple "working bee".
 
HaroldBishop said:
One comment from a pleb is getting way too much oxygen. Ignore it and move on ffs.
Click to expand...
It might have started with a “pleb” but it’s caught fire. And it would have caught fire without a few comments on Sharks Forever. If you wanna ignore it, then go for it. But it’s definitely still getting discussed in multiple places.

As far as what people are allowed to talk about, and where they get their info - where is the line on what is a reputable source in 2026?

Whether it’s the Telegraph, NRL.com, Fox Sports, Triple M, Nine, Fairfax, SEN, Snowman, James Graham, Paul Kent, Shinazz, Baldo - I’ve heard all of em bagged at some point, which are the ones spitting facts 100% of the time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SF
Mr Ryan said:
It might have started with a “pleb” but it’s caught fire. And it would have caught fire without a few comments on Sharks Forever. If you wanna ignore it, then go for it. But it’s definitely still getting discussed in multiple places.

As far as what people are allowed to talk about, and where they get their info - where is the line on what is a reputable source in 2026?

Whether it’s the Telegraph, NRL.com, Fox Sports, Triple M, Nine, Fairfax, SEN, Snowman, James Graham, Paul Kent, Shinazz, Baldo - I’ve heard all of em bagged at some point, which are the ones spitting facts 100% of the time?
Click to expand...
The reputable source mate is the club itself. I have faith in them and support everything they do. I do not accept for one second anything those on your list say until the club either confirms or denies it. Too many gullible people choose to believe everything others say and I have no idea why.
 
Sir Chadley said:
The reputable source mate is the club itself. I have faith in them and support everything they do. I do not accept for one second anything those on your list say until the club either confirms or denies it. Too many gullible people choose to believe everything others say and I have no idea why.
Click to expand...
I actually agree with pretty much everything you just said in regards to the most reliable source.

But I don’t think it’s about being gullible. People don’t necessarily believe everything they hear. What I’m trying to understand is why there is an aversion to talk about this topic on a Sharks’ forum?

I think we all agree that the ground is ****. Someone at the NRL probably stated the obvious that it’s ****. Dino also confirmed that they’re talking to Venues NSW about ways to make it less ****.

So talk away in my opinion.
 
Mr Ryan said:
I actually agree with pretty much everything you just said in regards to the most reliable source.

But I don’t think it’s about being gullible. People don’t necessarily believe everything they hear. What I’m trying to understand is why there is an aversion to talk about this topic on a Sharks’ forum?

I think we all agree that the ground is ****. Someone at the NRL probably stated the obvious that it’s ****. Dino also confirmed that they’re talking to Venues NSW about ways to make it less ****.

So talk away in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Totally agree with what you say about the ground. More than happy for everyone to talk about that.

The aversion about talking about the moving away from Shark Park topic on this forum is simply not to give those guys more airtime than they really deserve. They have made something up without checking their facts. It’s as simple as that.
 
Sir Chadley said:
Totally agree with what you say about the ground. More than happy for everyone to talk about that.

The aversion about talking about the moving away from Shark Park topic on this forum is simply not to give those guys more airtime than they really deserve. They have made something up without checking their facts. It’s as simple as that.
Click to expand...
Also they are different conversations.

Discussions about ground disrepair and the club choosing to hypothetically take games elsewhere are regularly had on here.

This conversation is about a fabricated rumour that we will be forced to moved. It won't be happening.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top