Unless you have Sione Katoa movement skills it’s not so easy*, but even a tiny bit of footwork so you don’t run exactly at where they are trying to line you upMaybe he should try running in between people instead of straight into them like Lang / Long .
I know there is not much space there in those yardage runs though ..
Just not the way the game is played now. Which is in no small part our own faults.Definitely needs to figure out how to win a contact. Cant doubt his heart, always throws himself straight back into them.
Would love to see some forwards take some runs off him on get out sets where it starts with our forwards back there (not deep kick ones), just to conserve the body a little.
Very much a work in progress
There’s def some other teams that dont run as many backs as us on get out sets when everyone’s already back thereJust not the way the game is played now. Which is in no small part our own faults.
Just needs to have some more awareness when he's running into traffic. Seems perpetually surprised when he's (frequently) laid out, like some giant forward has somehow teleported directly in front on him.
Xavier Coates was like that the first year or two until he filled out.The try and take from the drop out are what gives me hope. However, he's very little chance of beating tackles, and is getting folded repeatedly. Another preseason or two should really help him in these areas, and give him more chance to use his speed.
He's got something, just not what we've been used to with strong yardage carries.
He's here on a cheap deal long term. If it works out, we'll be laughing. If not he'll be fine depth on the wing.
Get out of here with factshe had more post contact metres than Ronnie for les runs
Does that mean he was dominated less than Ronaldo? I don't think there's a stat for how many times you get folded/put on your back. Ronnie was miles better at getting the balled played quickly and helping momentum. I like Stoney and think he cops way more than he deserves in here, but comparing him in yardage to Ronnie doesn't pass the eye test.he had more post contact metres than Ronnie for les runs
It means that his runs into traffic were more effective than Ronnie's.Does that mean he was dominated less than Ronaldo? I don't think there's a stat for how many times you get folded/put on your back. Ronnie was miles better at getting the balled played quickly and helping momentum. I like Stoney and think he cops way more than he deserves in here, but comparing him in yardage to Ronnie doesn't pass the eye test.
It doesn't actually. It means he made more total meters after contact, that's it.It means that his runs into traffic were more effective than Ronnie's.
It means that his runs into traffic were more effective than Ronnie's.
Yeah. There is no stat for "runs into traffic" either. To infer "effectiveness" statistically you would have to have a breakdown of where the runs happened, how many were hitups, how many defenders were in the tackle and so on.It doesn't actually. It means he made more total meters after contact, that's it.
A player can easily have less of those metres, but find their front quicker contributing to momentum for the next hit up. This would be a far more effective way of running into traffic.
You can't honestly watch the two last night and say Sam's hit ups were more effective than Ronaldo's.
What was his ptb speed? What spot was he getting to? Do they count negative contact yards?It means that his runs into traffic were more effective than Ronnie's.