A few things I took away from watching the game is comparing Leutele to Wright, but also comparing both those guys, and Feki, to the Storm backs (Chambers, Waqa).
First of all, all five outside backs looked on par. There was no massive jump in skill level with any of them. They looked like a great 1-5 all together.
Secondly, Leutele Vs Wright is an interesting match up because Leutele does everything wright. He has incredible footwork and seems to always do the correct thing to find the line or find open space. I really liked watching him. Wright on the other hand has the footwork of a prop. He just plods, but he still seems to get roughly the same results a lot of the time. I don't know if that means at that level that it's more about strength, speed and size than it is about skill but I found it interesting.
Wright didn't look bad at fullback, surprisingly. But he wasn't really tested much either.
I would say that at NRL level Leutele will hold his own with speed. Not lightning fast but certainly not slow. Power is a bit of a worry perhaps. It's clear to me that Best and Pomeroy have been dominating with power in the two games so far and I don't think Leutele would manage that, and that's probably the big difference. He seems more skilled than them.
Feki was okay. He didn't carve up, but he held his own. Had the odd run showing speed I wasn't expecting. Looked like he can handle wing but wasn't really tested a lot either.
Peachey was a lot like in the NYC. Very skilled back rower. Kicked a nice little grubber that would have resulted in a try but Balmain tapped it over the dead ball, so we got the restart. He also ran in a very easy looking try however looked good while doing it.
With Graham going to bench lock/utility it's hard to see Peachey getting a run, however I believe he could play NRL and look good.
It's important to note that Balmain were for the most part no match for the Sharks. It was like watching Under 16's play Under 14's. So you'd have to take any analysis with a grain of salt.