How's the headline aye, Club that needs Munster most; Sharks
Probably right but for arguments sake he wants 450k, we say, we’ll sign you for 250k & each game you play in FG you’ll get 15k
250k base
10k x 24 games (reg season) = 240k
So in a way, we dangle the carrot to him, we are prepared to pay over your 450k you want IF you back yourself to get your body right to play the intensity of FG NRL.
He’s get more money
We get to know his putting in the work away from field, ie, right diet, training in offseason & doing the right recovery etc
I'd love to see some examples of NRL contracts and get an idea just how much is or is not guaranteed money for most players.
Is heavy incentives a thing or not? Is it common or not?
The NFL really spells it out. In NRL every player above 120 or so could be on 2-10k match payments and a base wage or almost none of them could be on match payments.
In NFL though if cap is going astray you can just cut/trade players. A lot harder in NRL to do that so actual cap management might need to be a bit tighter.
There is some cap dickery in it too I believe
I think if we had Moyza this year on 350k total but it was something like base 200k guaranteed and 50k if he played 10+ games, 50k if he played 20+ games and 50k if he played 20+ and we made finals I believe he would only count against this years cap for 250k because he only hit one of those milestones
last season.
But it bites you in arse when the same 350k contract counts for 450k the next year because he hit all three milestones in 2022 so you have to pay the difference unaccounted for previous cap
and have them available against current cap.
A contributing factor to teams that win Prems getting picked apart perhaps, not only do all players suddenly appear more valuable but they also likely all hit many of their bonuses which creates big cap pressure the next season. Maybe then part of the reason consistent teams (Storm, Roosters, now Penrith) can hold strong for extended periods is continued success means consistent cap expectations, a fast rising team gets burned a lot harder by high finish bonuses than a team that finished highly the year before and does it again.
I'd think the inclination would only be to heavily incentive younger players contracts... Moylan playing a good amount of games is not the sort of thing we want punishing our cap the next year. A young guy exploding onto the scene? Yeah happy to wear that one - take Taukamo in NRL squad next season, imagine if he was on base wage with a 20k bonus if he makes an NRL debut? Against the season after cap that is bugger all but you know he'd work his arse off to try get it and if he was able to play well enough to make an NRL debut, fantastic.
On example you put Bundy, if he had that for this year, he played 15 games last season (2021) so he'd count for 400k against this seasons cap (22), if we kept him on same deal next season and he played say 20 games this season (22) he'd count for 500k against the next seasons cap (23) - expectation of 20 games again plus the 5 not accounted for in this years cap (22).
Not sure if adding the years made that clearer or worse haha