Official Jesse Ramien

Sparkles said:
It was an interesting one, for sure. Someone might have a better answer on when the bunker has full authority. Perhaps the ref needs to hand the decision over, which he didn't do in this case

Edit: this was educational:
www.nrl.com

Ponga send-off and judiciary process explained

NRL GM of Elite Football Graham Annesley has backed referee Ashley Klein's decision to send off Queensland fullback Kalyn Ponga in Origin I.
www.nrl.com www.nrl.com
Click to expand...
That link is dead.
 
Born&bred said:
That link is dead.
Click to expand...
Huh. They must have taken it down due to our scrutiny...

This is the official link:

And here's a (cough AI cough) summary so you don't have to read all of this boring ****:

According to the document, specifically in the section "NRL Bunker – Official Review Room" on pages 25-28, the referee can ask for a bunker review, but the final decision-making authority remains with the referee on the field.
  • The bunker reviews incidents when a challenge is initiated by the captain or when the referee requests a review.
  • The bunker provides advice, recommendations, or confirms decisions based on video evidence.
  • The referee uses the bunker’s input to make the final ruling on the field.
  • The referee is not obligated to accept the bunker’s findings blindly but typically follows the bunker’s advice since the bunker has access to multiple camera angles and replay technology.
  • The referee retains discretion and judgment in applying the bunker’s review to the game situation.
  • If the bunker finds an infringement or error, the referee will usually overturn or amend the on-field decision.
  • If the bunker finds the original decision correct or the review inconclusive, the referee will uphold the original ruling.
  • The referee can also call time off to allow the bunker to complete its review before restarting play.
In summary, the referee can request a bunker review and considers the bunker’s findings carefully, but the referee has the ultimate authority to accept or reject the bunker’s advice when making rulings on the field.

This is detailed in the "NRL Bunker – Official Review Room" section starting on page 25, including the process for challenges, reviews, and the referee’s role in final decisions.
 
Sparkles said:
Huh. They must have taken it down due to our scrutiny...

This is the official link:

And here's a (cough AI cough) summary so you don't have to read all of this boring ****:

According to the document, specifically in the section "NRL Bunker – Official Review Room" on pages 25-28, the referee can ask for a bunker review, but the final decision-making authority remains with the referee on the field.
  • The bunker reviews incidents when a challenge is initiated by the captain or when the referee requests a review.
  • The bunker provides advice, recommendations, or confirms decisions based on video evidence.
  • The referee uses the bunker’s input to make the final ruling on the field.
  • The referee is not obligated to accept the bunker’s findings blindly but typically follows the bunker’s advice since the bunker has access to multiple camera angles and replay technology.
  • The referee retains discretion and judgment in applying the bunker’s review to the game situation.
  • If the bunker finds an infringement or error, the referee will usually overturn or amend the on-field decision.
  • If the bunker finds the original decision correct or the review inconclusive, the referee will uphold the original ruling.
  • The referee can also call time off to allow the bunker to complete its review before restarting play.
In summary, the referee can request a bunker review and considers the bunker’s findings carefully, but the referee has the ultimate authority to accept or reject the bunker’s advice when making rulings on the field.

This is detailed in the "NRL Bunker – Official Review Room" section starting on page 25, including the process for challenges, reviews, and the referee’s role in final decisions.
Click to expand...
AI missed a few mate.

  • The bunker is not obligated to make the correct call at any time
  • The bunker reserves the right to use a magic 8 ball
  • Should Jesse Ramien appear in any frame of the video, award a penalty against the Sharks
 
Sparkles said:
And here's a (cough AI cough) summary so you don't have to read all of this boring ****:

According to the document, specifically in the section "NRL Bunker – Official Review Room" on pages 25-28, the referee can ask for a bunker review, but the final decision-making authority remains with the referee on the field.
  • The bunker reviews incidents when a challenge is initiated by the captain or when the referee requests a review.
  • The bunker provides advice, recommendations, or confirms decisions based on video evidence.
  • The referee uses the bunker’s input to make the final ruling on the field.
  • The referee is not obligated to accept the bunker’s findings blindly but typically follows the bunker’s advice since the bunker has access to multiple camera angles and replay technology.
  • The referee retains discretion and judgment in applying the bunker’s review to the game situation.
  • If the bunker finds an infringement or error, the referee will usually overturn or amend the on-field decision.
  • If the bunker finds the original decision correct or the review inconclusive, the referee will uphold the original ruling.
  • The referee can also call time off to allow the bunker to complete its review before restarting play.
In summary, the referee can request a bunker review and considers the bunker’s findings carefully, but the referee has the ultimate authority to accept or reject the bunker’s advice when making rulings on the field.

This is detailed in the "NRL Bunker – Official Review Room" section starting on page 25, including the process for challenges, reviews, and the referee’s role in final decisions.
Click to expand...
Have you got a summary for your summary?
 
When he plays like this, it really makes me wonder if we’ve made the right decision to let him go for next season.
 
HaroldBishop said:
Mate he's been with us for 9 seasons. That's a big enough sample size.
Click to expand...
Understand that but what I seen today from Gabriel, I truly don’t believe he’s close to being ready. Centre next season could end up being a real weakness for us.

Ramien, Hiroti, Vea’lia & Talakai all leaving. Think we should be going to market for a new centre so we have multiple options at least in that position.
 
Gumby said:
Understand that but what I seen today from Gabriel, I truly don’t believe he’s close to being ready. Centre next season could end up being a real weakness for us.

Ramien, Hiroti, Vea’lia & Talakai all leaving. Think we should be going to market for a new centre so we have multiple options at least in that position.
Click to expand...

We are going to have teething pains with him but what’s the alternative leave him in the Jets without knowing if he’s ready?

He has half a season or so with the Jets and another off season he will be as ready as he can be before playing first grade

Will be nice if he can get a game or two this year to give him a taste
 
Tiger Shark said:
We are going to have teething pains with him but what’s the alternative leave him in the Jets without knowing if he’s ready?

He has half a season or so with the Jets and another off season he will be as ready as he can be before playing first grade

Will be nice if he can get a game or two this year to give him a taste
Click to expand...
Yeah I’m hoping he gets a couple this year also just to give a true indication of where he’s at. Just concerned that we may be putting all our eggs into one basket. Don’t want to see it blow up in our face is all. But I’m sure with 4 players who play centre for us leaving, the club has a few things in motion they’re working on.
 
I’ll let him have one game, and it’s when we rest players round 27 because we are locked into a home final

Other than that I can’t hope we have enough injuries we have to call up underperforming a Jets centres
 
Tiger Shark said:
We are going to have teething pains with him but what’s the alternative leave him in the Jets without knowing if he’s ready?

He has half a season or so with the Jets and another off season he will be as ready as he can be before playing first grade

Will be nice if he can get a game or two this year to give him a taste
Click to expand...
Fitz has had the opportunity to put him in but has passed

I'm not as sure as others that he is the plan for next year, fitz has shown before with the likes of stonestreet, iro and even tricky with they way they are groomed into first grade

I have a feeling we will (or have) signed a centre for next year
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top