Cage
Bull Shark
Whichever way you look at it, the problem would seem to lie with our board.
Either they are totally inept at picking a good CEO, or if they do, are incapable of working with him. One can only speculate that any CEO who dares to show initiative, and takes steps to do things that should have been done long ago, will soon attract the attention, and more likely the ire, of the board.
I have been out of the Shire for a long time so I have not had the opportunity to acquaint myself with the various board members. For that reason I haven't formed any opinions of individuals. However, as a group they seem to have a problem working with the CEO's they have chosen, whose CV's they have, hopefully, carefully scrutinised, and whose backgrounds they have thoroughly checked.
Is this a paid gig? Are there Director's Fees involved? Lurks and perks? I don't know, just asking.
Surely, among our 15K members, we can find half a dozen well credentialed people, without self interest, to keep our club heading in the right direction.
Either they are totally inept at picking a good CEO, or if they do, are incapable of working with him. One can only speculate that any CEO who dares to show initiative, and takes steps to do things that should have been done long ago, will soon attract the attention, and more likely the ire, of the board.
I have been out of the Shire for a long time so I have not had the opportunity to acquaint myself with the various board members. For that reason I haven't formed any opinions of individuals. However, as a group they seem to have a problem working with the CEO's they have chosen, whose CV's they have, hopefully, carefully scrutinised, and whose backgrounds they have thoroughly checked.
Is this a paid gig? Are there Director's Fees involved? Lurks and perks? I don't know, just asking.
Surely, among our 15K members, we can find half a dozen well credentialed people, without self interest, to keep our club heading in the right direction.
