egg
Jaws
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2010
- Messages
- 14,256
- Reaction score
- 2,483
He also was part of a premership winning team!
My point is that not all spine members need to be superstars either.
Unless you're The Roosters. Storm or Broncos
He also was part of a premership winning team!
My point is that not all spine members need to be superstars either.
He can replace Tuku Hau Tapuha as the young giant we never play because being the biggest kid doesn't translate as well into CupLet him go to parra and get that loko from dragons
Can do it for cheaper than Braden tooHe can replace Tuku Hau Tapuha as the young giant we never play because being the biggest kid doesn't translate as well into Cup
And I say replace as Tuks has disappeared off both Sharks and NSWRL websites as a player
Likely cheaper yes, but assuming we are extending him and not just getting him for rest of season, we are tying him (and his presumably upgraded contract) to our cap for much longer than whatever Braden has left. Absolutely not worth it unless we want this guy for a few years.Can do it for cheaper than Braden too
Very similar numbers with very different experience levels. I’d say only 1 of them is gonna get better.Likely cheaper yes, but assuming we are extending him and not just getting him for rest of season, we are tying him (and his presumably upgraded contract) to our cap for much longer than whatever Braden has left. Absolutely not worth it unless we want this guy for a few years.
Compare their 2025s
Uele won more @ 67% vs 20%
Obviously team is a big factor in that, but worth noting Sharks win rate was 62.5% and Dragons was 33.3%, so we won above average amount of time when playing Uele, and they lost an above average amount of time when playing Tonga. Many factors of course.
They scored tries at approx same rate
Uele broke 1.3 tackles per game vs 1
Tonga made 34 PCM vs 32
Uele had 0.4 offloads a game, Tonga 0.3
Effectively same number of tackles per game (Tonga 0.4 more)
Tonga did have a 3% better efficiency rate though, for an impressive 97.7%
Uele ran 3 more meters per game
So basically we'd be tying ourselves to a younger (and hopefully room to improve) Uele for longer, to save maybe 100k or so this season.
I’m still for itLikely cheaper yes, but assuming we are extending him and not just getting him for rest of season, we are tying him (and his presumably upgraded contract) to our cap for much longer than whatever Braden has left. Absolutely not worth it unless we want this guy for a few years.
Compare their 2025s
Uele won more @ 67% vs 20%
Obviously team is a big factor in that, but worth noting Sharks win rate was 62.5% and Dragons was 33.3%, so we won above average amount of time when playing Uele, and they lost an above average amount of time when playing Tonga. Many factors of course.
They scored tries at approx same rate
Uele broke 1.3 tackles per game vs 1
Tonga made 34 PCM vs 32
Uele had 0.4 offloads a game, Tonga 0.3
Effectively same number of tackles per game (Tonga 0.4 more)
Tonga did have a 3% better efficiency rate though, for an impressive 97.7%
Uele ran 3 more meters per game
So basically we'd be tying ourselves to a younger (and hopefully room to improve) Uele for longer, to save maybe 100k or so this season.
Very similar numbers with very different experience levels. I’d say only 1 of them is gonna get better.
I don't know enough about what our plans are for the rest of our forwards - I certainly don't hate the concept of signing him, but the stats show it is more about next couple years than this year.I’m still for it
Probably a fair chance signing Loko steps on Faitili's toes and he looks elsewhere.
Could go either way for sure. Talakai leaves one spot, but the other would have to come from somewhere else. There's certainly a few other forwards coming through for us already too.Maybe. Or they can make a powerful combo
Talakai, Uele, McInnes, Tuku, Rudolf not far behind. Plenty of room for both if they both kick onCould go either way for sure. Talakai leaves one spot, but the other would have to come from somewhere else. There's certainly a few other forwards coming through for us already too.
Only two of those are in the 17 currently though.Talakai, Uele, McInnes, Tuku, Rudolf not far behind. Plenty of room for both if they both kick on
Agreed he has been good for last couple of years (which by chance also aligns with contract time)Rudolf should be re-signed, he's been one of our best and consistent players since getting dropped
He's been pretty vocal about being interested in PNG. I'd be very surprised if he didn't just sign a 1 year extension.Agreed he has been good for last couple of years (which by chance also aligns with contract time)
Had been average (and fat) prior to that for a number of years.
Don’t get me wrong at this point he should be signed…..but wouldn’t be offering a long term contract…
Yep and I think that suits both parties just fineHe's been pretty vocal about being interested in PNG. I'd be very surprised if he didn't just sign a 1 year extension.
Well yes, you do re-sign players based on their current form and not their previous form. Thats like not signing James Maloney because he didnt win a premiership with the WarriorsAgreed he has been good for last couple of years (which by chance also aligns with contract time)
Had been average (and fat) prior to that for a number of years.
Don’t get me wrong at this point he should be signed…..but wouldn’t be offering a long term contract…
They don't even need to sign anyone or have McInnes come back for that to become and issue.Probably a fair chance signing Loko steps on Faitili's toes and he looks elsewhere.
As per Fa'atili thread... comparable minutes to JJBM and Taatao. More than McCullough.. but Felix has played every game and those guys have each been rotated out to 18th man at least once. I think he would probably get the final bench spot ahead of those other 3 but I wouldn't bet my left nut on it.His stats on paper tell me otherwise, He's currently 3rd for Tackle breaks in cup, has about the same minutes as the rest of the props very solid defensive numbers and barely any errors/ penalties.