Official Braden Uele

HaroldBishop said:
Yeah bit of water to go under the bridge until we think about that, depends on some younger guys being ready.

I reckon as long as at least one of BHU/Toby have a good injury free run we'll keep one on a reduced contract.
Click to expand...
Agree. We thought that about Kennedy with Ison and Dykes....

Truth is, we never have a full crop of players to choose from.
 
It's a good sign this bloke has come back in and performed straight away from the outset. Usually takes him 4 weeks to find some form (and then get injured again) but I guess he didn't have as long a layoff as usual this time around which probably helped.

I think Big Ham would relise his position in the 17 is potentially in jeopardy in the short and medium term (beyond current contract) so he has not got any more time to **** around and has gotta earn his place in the pack
 
Gards said:
It's a good sign this bloke has come back in and performed straight away from the outset. Usually takes him 4 weeks to find some form (and then get injured again) but I guess he didn't have as long a layoff as usual this time around which probably helped.

I think Big Ham would relise his position in the 17 is potentially in jeopardy in the short and medium term (beyond current contract) so he has not got any more time to **** around and has gotta earn his place in the pack
Click to expand...
I think it was his first preseason in about 3 years. Makes a massive difference.
 
Would be a huge bonus if he can play the majority of the remaining games. I was critical of the club for re signing him when the Warriors were sniffing around, not because he's a poor player, because he'd not, I just thought we weren't getting value for money out of him because of his injury/ fitness record. But I would love him to prove me wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top