HaroldBishop
Megalodon
Could do that given we have cover, or could put him on the bench.I'd give Nikora another rest, that was a big game, plus a couple of head knocks.
Could do that given we have cover, or could put him on the bench.I'd give Nikora another rest, that was a big game, plus a couple of head knocks.
Yeah, I'd be benching Nikora if he plays. Brailey and AFB with 30 and 25 mins respectively should be okay you'd think.Could do that given we have cover, or could put him on the bench.
Agree. Burns has it covered.I'd give Nikora another rest, that was a big game, plus a couple of head knocks.
He'd be there even if he had to operate on himself the day beforeSurely he backs up for us now on Saturday.
Makes sense. Plus it sounds like he's a bit of a confidence player, so I'm not sure how he'll take the loss... might need to work it based on if it's better for him mentally to play or notI'd give Nikora another rest, that was a big game, plus a couple of head knocks.
Yeah I dunno, that's a pretty poor reason to miss a game for a professional athlete imo.Makes sense. Plus it sounds like he's a bit of a confidence player, so I'm not sure how he'll take the loss... might need to work it based on if it's better for him mentally to play or not
I mean more that if he's not 100% fit it still might still be best to get him some game time to get past the disappointment of his last start.Yeah I dunno, that's a pretty poor reason to miss a game for a professional athlete imo.
Don't use my approach. I don't think playing once a year would do any player any good!I mean more that if he's not 100% fit it still might still be best to get him some game time to get past the disappointment of his last start.
Basically the same approach @apezza uses in the boudoir
I agree with this. I'd 100% be playing Nikora even if its just for 25 minutes off the bench.See how they are tracking but assuming all feel good
- start AFB and let him carry his momentum, easy enough to manage his minutes down a little through game if needed
- bench Blayke for Pep, just with the arm and under fatigue I'd let the sting come out of the game a bit before putting him in, like storm have done with Grant
- bench Nikora, again just conserves him a little but also gets Burns some guaranteed minutes before he goes into a middle rotation Pep is also joining
Bench is Hazelton/Colquhoun, Blayke, Brit and Talakai
Hiroti and Kaufusi become the unused bench reserves, Berrell, Stoney and Tuks out
We play Friday next week so for those 3 it's 3 games in 9 days so it's worth managing their minutes here, and if they are a concern at all or feeling fatigued just rest them, we can cover them all well enough to still be in it if people play well (/smart).
No need to brag mate!Don't use my approach. I don't think playing once a year would do any player any good!
See how they are tracking but assuming all feel good
- start AFB and let him carry his momentum, easy enough to manage his minutes down a little through game if needed
- bench Blayke for Pep, just with the arm and under fatigue I'd let the sting come out of the game a bit before putting him in, like storm have done with Grant
- bench Nikora, again just conserves him a little but also gets Burns some guaranteed minutes before he goes into a middle rotation Pep is also joining
Bench is Hazelton/Colquhoun, Blayke, Brit and Talakai
Hiroti and Kaufusi become the unused bench reserves, Berrell, Stoney and Tuks out
We play Friday next week so for those 3 it's 3 games in 9 days so it's worth managing their minutes here, and if they are a concern at all or feeling fatigued just rest them, we can cover them all well enough to still be in it if people play well (/smart).
Who are you starting, AFB and Kaufusi? Or Tuks?if this is the case i'd say talakai is the one who sits out..
hazo, JC, brit, blayke
Who are you starting, AFB and Kaufusi? Or Tuks?
Deary me how could they possibly rate Barnett and AFB the same???![]()
Debate over after masterclass as enforcers set stage for ambush: NSW Player Ratings
Debate over after masterclass as enforcers set stage for ambush: NSW Player Ratingswww.foxsports.com.au
Fox rate Brailey a 5.5/10 - apparently him and Tedesco who got knocked out were NSW equal worst players
(besides a Strange cameo 4/10)
Worse than Koula, who at fullback let two bombs bounce and nearly cost NSW the game.
Notably worse than Bostock who had 3 errors and was lucky it wasn't 4 with one wiping a try.
Robson got a 6.5 for finally unlocking his running game but Blayke had same amount of tackle breaks and offloads, in just over half the time.
Couldn't have at least called him a 6/10?
(if anyone wondering but doesn't wanna click the link, AFB got 6.5, so he was equal with Barnett, with the two being notably worse than every other forward, all on 8s)
Really just posting it just to post it because I don't think I've ever seen a fox rating article I have agreed with haha
Ragebait![]()
Debate over after masterclass as enforcers set stage for ambush: NSW Player Ratings
Debate over after masterclass as enforcers set stage for ambush: NSW Player Ratingswww.foxsports.com.au
Fox rate Brailey a 5.5/10 - apparently him and Tedesco who got knocked out were NSW equal worst players
(besides a Strange cameo 4/10)
Worse than Koula, who at fullback let two bombs bounce and nearly cost NSW the game.
Notably worse than Bostock who had 3 errors and was lucky it wasn't 4 with one wiping a try.
Robson got a 6.5 for finally unlocking his running game but Blayke had same amount of tackle breaks and offloads, in just over half the time.
Couldn't have at least called him a 6/10?
(if anyone wondering but doesn't wanna click the link, AFB got 6.5, so he was equal with Barnett, with the two being notably worse than every other forward, all on 8s)
Really just posting it just to post it because I don't think I've ever seen a fox rating article I have agreed with haha
Be interested to know the formulaRagebait
Take their actual player ratings.Be interested to know the formula
Maybe do your ratings, then pick 4 to add or subtract 0.5 to, and three to add or subtract 1.0?
That should mean absolutely nobody can ever look at it and not disagree with at least one rating, and disagreement nets more interest than agreement.