I'd love the cash available, but I think like most I'm not bitter about it. He gave us the greatest moment ever as fans, I can put up with one more year if need be.
It's more sad for him to not even be in the top 21 for next year. Wish he could have gone out on top for his legacy.
I've said before if someone said Fifita will play a huge hand in winning you a grand final but soon after will be on big money and start deteriorating to the point he starts being not selected just 4 seasons after and only good enough for a handful of minutes when there are a lot of injuries for next two years, all still as highest paid prop in the game I'd 100% take the deal for the Premiership. No question.
At the end of the day I am a Sharks supporter more than a Fifita supporter though so I won't not call it like I see it and that is for the last two season and for next year we are worse off having him than spending the money elsewhere and have missed the boat to do anything about it.
I hate that we are watching such an insanely good player at his peak decline like this and struggle to make the team. I also hate we are spending close to 10% of the cap on him while we do it and every weak bitching about losing the forward battle and needing another gun player to be competitive.
Or 400k and a 3 year contract on staff.
I def could be wrong about that but I think offering someone 1.2million in incentive needs to be cleared with the NRL and that they would not necessarily decide that 400k of that at a time goes against our cap over three years.
From memory around the medical retirement of Greg Inglis that wasn't actually that the NRL had to determine that the post playing salary he was being offered did not factor as an incentive into his decision to retire.
It does seem like Fifita could convincingly retire and that we may reasonably want to employ him afterwards so could be possible. The tough bit would just be ensuring NRL agrees that the unpaid retirement and offered job are both genuine enough.