SF
Mako Shark
Huge game this, we're coming off 2 wins and we have the bye the week after, would be fantastic going into it with 3 wins in a row.
Sounds familiarHuge game this, we're coming off 2 wins and we have the bye the week after, would be fantastic going into it with 3 wins in a row.
Yeah I’d anticipate Brit to be available based on mentions of burner, which gives us a start ofStill a decent side even if the worst happens. I think Vea’ila would be ahead of Jones, even though Jones is probably playing better. Blake Hosking would be an able substitute if we needed another replacement. Niwhai Puru is still out injured.
If we started to get really tested in the forwards it’d be good to see Fearnley or Faatili get a run.
I imagine half on the injured list will still play though

Cheers JenniI'll be at the game but wont be able to make the meet and great. @bort and @Western Sharkie, hope you get a chance.
View attachment 34641
100%Huge game this, we're coming off 2 wins and we have the bye the week after, would be fantastic going into it with 3 wins in a row.
I think Hiroti would be playing regardless of Gabriel being injured. He is not ready to come in straight away - unless there was no other option.100%
Need to get under their skin a bit. Tedesco is a sook and will spend the whole game crying at the ref.
Be interesting we line up given a few injuries. Its a shame Gabriel is also injured though, but faith in Hiroti to fill in well.
Still a problem how quickly and easy we can just relinquish control of a game. A few times yesterday we did all the hardwork and then it was penalty/6 again into Try. Gotta be better disciplined or learn how to shut down attack when we’re letting them march
probably. But Fitz goes cold on players that have signed elswhere tooI think Hiroti would be playing regardless of Gabriel being injured. He is not ready to come in straight away - unless there was no other option.
Really? Who has he purposefully left out (that deserved to be in the 17)?probably. But Fitz goes cold on players that have signed elswhere too
He basically ****ed over both Metcalf and Atkinson once they signed elsewhere. Kept DA as a utility but most the time he go a cameo as a forward an LM he just used as 18th man all year.Really? Who has he purposefully left out (that deserved to be in the 17)?
Wasn’t Trindall the starter before Atkinson even signed at club? So why would Fitz randomly pick Atkinson ahead of him after he’d signed elsewhere if he wasn’t doing it before?He basically ****ed over both Metcalf and Atkinson once they signed elsewhere. Kept DA as a utility but most the time he go a cameo as a forward an LM he just used as 18th man all year.
Neither probably deserved or should have been near the run on but they hardly played any footy for firsts or reggies in those seasons
What?Wasn’t Trindall the starter before Atkinson even signed at club? So why would Fitz randomly pick Atkinson ahead of him after he’d signed elsewhere if he wasn’t doing it before?
Basically same question for Metcalf. Trindall already established ahead of him before he signed away as Fitz arrived.
Metcalf also signed away so early, he probably didn’t give himself the best chance he to factored into plans through preseason.