(Archived) THE RUMOUR MILL - Player Movement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,440
Reaction score
811
Location
NSW
Half a season 2014, a few last year.

Im not baggin the guy, but hes never gunna be a super star
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,507
Reaction score
8,395
Location
Sydney
Dude nu is good but not that good. We all had high hopes and hes never had a **** game, but hes no definite starter at any club but newy. Be a shame to see him go, but it wouldnt be a massive loss either
Agree, he's a but overrated in here for sure.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
It's definitely common knowledge he has been training with the club and there's no issue with it.

No different than the Dave Taylor train and trial contract in place with the Raiders.

Photo won't hurt anything. Paranoia much?
 

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
the difference is, dave taylor has been released from his contract whilst segeyaro is in the middle of a legal battle and still registered to the UK and English superleague
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
the difference is, dave taylor has been released from his contract whilst segeyaro is in the middle of a legal battle and still registered to the UK and English superleague

The NRL are aware of the situation with Seggy and have no issue with it.

So why does a forum?
 

Gumby

Jaws
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
15,357
Reaction score
2,356
Location
Melbourne
If chad goes down at some point this year Nu would be my first pick for the 7.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
I don't know the ins and outs of the contract situation but Leeds might have an issue.

Leeds only have an issue with the NRL enforcing that his contract is paid out / agreement reached before registering him and protecting their interest/investment.

They couldn't give a toss where he is training because they have gone on record and said they don't want him back.

Furthermore the Sharks have a contract & agreement in place with Seggy that stipulates they will only proceed with him once his issues with Leeds have been sorted.

You are all over reacting to a photo of him training when everyone knows it is occurring and no one has raised any issues relating to it.
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
24,875
Reaction score
3,559
Location
Melbourne
Leeds only have an issue with the NRL enforcing that his contract is paid out / agreement reached before registering him and protecting their interest/investment.

They couldn't give a toss where he is training because they have gone on record and said they don't want him back.

Furthermore the Sharks have a contract & agreement in place with Seggy that stipulates they will only proceed with him once his issues with Leeds have been sorted.

You are all over reacting to a photo of him training when everyone knows it is occurring and no one has raised any issues relating to it.

Is that actually a photo of Seggy training? I thought it was a photo of an action figure on a tabletop cricket set.
 

egg

Jaws
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
12,895
Reaction score
1,089
From the FOX Supercoach whisperer Phil Prior
Take it as you please

Phil Prior
OK... just had a chat to Hooper. Apparently the plan is to keep Brailey starting at 9 and have Seggy coming off the bench... WHEN the deal gets done
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,507
Reaction score
8,395
Location
Sydney
From the FOX Supercoach whisperer Phil Prior
Take it as you please

Phil Prior
OK... just had a chat to Hooper. Apparently the plan is to keep Brailey starting at 9 and have Seggy coming off the bench... WHEN the deal gets done

Not sure why you wouldn't want him on the field for 80, or very close to it.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
Wouldn't surprise me if it maybe starts off that way for a few weeks to give Brailey some experience, but then ends up switching.

Even with Seggy coming - i'd use both players.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,507
Reaction score
8,395
Location
Sydney
Wouldn't surprise me if it maybe starts off that way for a few weeks to give Brailey some experience, but then ends up switching.

Even with Seggy coming - i'd use both players.

But why? We wouldn't have done that with Ennis and Seggy could be just as important. If he's capable of playing 80 effective minutes that's how we should use him. Having a hooker on the bench would be a waste imo.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
I don't believe either of them are capable of playing a quality 80 minutes week in week out.

Quality 80 min hookers are very very sought after. That's why Ennis is such a loss.

If you want to talk about a waste, carrying a bench back (Beale)... is a waste.

Fortunately for Flanno it worked out a fair bit last year with niggling injuries / backs getting injured more than forwards for us during games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top