Official Briton Nikora

bort

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,500
Reaction score
6,315
Location
IN A BAR
MrDravid said:
From memory, the Bunker said he didn't try and catch the ball (tried to bat it back) so was a disruptor... Interesting interpretation of that's the case.
Click to expand...
Same with perpetration against Will in round 1
Didn’t make a genuine attempt to catch the ball (tried to bat it back)

Seen many bat backs allowed though.

Did he have a decent crack at the ball: yes/no
That simple, don’t try and interpret players intention. If timed well enough to play for the ball then timed well enough to allow.
 
A

apezza

Great White
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,649
Reaction score
2,431
bort said:
Same with perpetration against Will in round 1
Didn’t make a genuine attempt to catch the ball (tried to bat it back)

Seen many bat backs allowed though.

Did he have a decent crack at the ball: yes/no
That simple, don’t try and interpret players intention. If timed well enough to play for the ball then timed well enough to allow.
Click to expand...
From memory the ref got it completely wrong in Rd 1 as Kennedy actually got to the ball and bat it back. Should have been play on.
 
MMsharks

MMsharks

Great White
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
4,872
Reaction score
989
Location
Sutherland Shire
bort said:
Same with perpetration against Will in round 1
Didn’t make a genuine attempt to catch the ball (tried to bat it back)

Seen many bat backs allowed though.

Did he have a decent crack at the ball: yes/no
That simple, don’t try and interpret players intention. If timed well enough to play for the ball then timed well enough to allow.
Click to expand...
But wasn't it because he overran the ball - that's what the bunker said, definitely heard them say that he overan the ball - sounded like the reason for the discretion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top