snowman
Total gronk
you are correct, we have only offered will a one year dealI’ve heard we have offered 1 year.
this covers dykes and gives us a look at another fullback
you are correct, we have only offered will a one year dealI’ve heard we have offered 1 year.
Yeah 1 year is ideal for us. But as I've said, and you have, he'll definitely agitate for more.I’d be surprised if he only signs for 1 year , I think from a Sharks perspective it works, maybe a CO but it covers us with Dykes.
He’s going to want more job security than a one year deal.
Question is how many clubs would offer him a longer deal
Dykes‘ injury and not being able to play and develop this season certainly throws a scanner in the works.Yeah 1 year is ideal for us. But as I've said, and you have, he'll definitely agitate for more.
If he won't budge are we prepared to say bye bye and go with Dykes next year?
Big call.
Do young kids these days know what a scanner is?Dykes‘ injury and not being able to play and develop this season certainly throws a scanner in the works.
I like WK and think there is a good footballer there. I personally think a 2 year deal works and gives KD time next year to get up to full speed again and challenge WK for the FB position.
competition for spots is healthy for the team
great questionI’d be surprised if he only signs for 1 year , I think from a Sharks perspective it works, maybe a CO but it covers us with Dykes.
He’s going to want more job security than a one year deal.
Question is how many clubs would offer him a longer deal
imagine throwing a scanner at some **** just to make a pointDo young kids these days know what a scanner is?
Have you not heard about the bad weatherman theory?i believe nothing that comes out of snowmans mouth
watch him sign for 2 years
It's probably the best thing for him in the long run. Enough farting around in the middle of the fullback pack, let's see him back at his best and pushing to cement his spot. He's got a lot of potential.you are correct, we have only offered will a one year deal
this covers dykes and gives us a look at another fullback
Just need one. Dragons most likely.great question
go through the ladder (alphabetical order)
brisbane - no
canberra - yes
bulldogs - no, should be yes
cronulla -
dolphins - no
titans - no
manly - if they move turbo to centre he is the best fit for them, however garrick, so no
melbourne - no
warriors - no
newcastle - miller and kpp so no
cowboys - no
parramatta - no
penrith - no
souths - no
st george - yes, on overs as well
roosters - no
tigers - should be yes, but they wont
so not many really
No thanksJust need one. Dragons most likely.
Can we Welsby over here? Dykes getting injured is so unlucky.
Who said nobody is showing interest in him? I am sure nobody here would actually know this for sure. I have no doubt he would find another contract if he did not re-sign.If Kennedy is such a good player why isn’t he in demand? Why are hardly any clubs showing any interest in him? And why is he only getting offered a 1 year deal from us?
Yes, it's a strange way to make a point, unless someone has one of those new fandangle Kennedy-interest-detectors of course.Who said nobody is showing interest in him? I am sure nobody here would actually know this for sure. I have no doubt he would find another contract if he did not re-sign.
Who said nobody is showing interest in him? I am sure nobody here would actually know this for sure. I have no doubt he would find another contract if he did not re-sign.
Being on this forum for some time now, you both should know that Gumby is the all time King of transfer and new signing knowledge and all information from the clubs goes through him first.Yes, it's a strange way to make a point, unless someone has one of those new fandangle Kennedy-interest-detectors of course.
Yep, so there won’t be a lot of teams fighting to sign him.great question
go through the ladder (alphabetical order)
brisbane - no
canberra - yes
bulldogs - no, should be yes
cronulla -
dolphins - no
titans - no
manly - if they move turbo to centre he is the best fit for them, however garrick, so no
melbourne - no
warriors - no
newcastle - miller and kpp so no
cowboys - no
parramatta - no
penrith - no
souths - no
st george - yes, on overs as well
roosters - no
tigers - should be yes, but they wont
so not many really